Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Method matcher should match Java primitive types in Kotlin #626

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

timtebeek
Copy link
Contributor

@timtebeek timtebeek commented Jan 11, 2025

What's changed?

Add a test to check that we can match Java primitive types in Kotlin

What's your motivation?

Saw that we do not match, as the method type uses kotlin.Int, not any Java int, which we then fail to match.

image

The declaring type does contain methods with the correct types, so perhaps we should look up the matching method as opposed to trusting the association look up.

private JavaType.@Nullable Method methodInvocationType(PsiElement psi) {
return psiElementAssociations.methodInvocationType(psi);
}

image

@timtebeek timtebeek added bug Something isn't working parser-kotlin labels Jan 11, 2025
@timtebeek timtebeek self-assigned this Jan 11, 2025
@timtebeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

timtebeek commented Jan 11, 2025

I've briefly explored doing a method lookup in the declared type, but it's not pretty, and not sure if such an approach will fully work:

private JavaType.@Nullable Method methodInvocationType(PsiElement psi) {
    JavaType.Method psiMethodType = psiElementAssociations.methodInvocationType(psi);

    // Look for method in the declaring type to find the correct method parameter types, not the Kotlin equivalents
    JavaType.FullyQualified declaringType = psiMethodType.getDeclaringType();
    for (JavaType.Method m : declaringType.getMethods()) {
        if (m.getName().equals(psiMethodType.getName())) {
            List<JavaType> declParameterTypes = m.getParameterTypes();
            List<JavaType> psiParameterTypes = psiMethodType.getParameterTypes();
            if (declParameterTypes.size() == psiParameterTypes.size()) {
                for (int i = 0; i < declParameterTypes.size(); i++) {
                    JavaType declType = declParameterTypes.get(i);
                    JavaType psiType = psiParameterTypes.get(i);

                    // TODO compare types JavaType.Primitive.Int and JavaType.Class kotlin.Int, and similar friends
                }
            }
        }
    }
    return psiMethodType;
}

@timtebeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

timtebeek commented Jan 12, 2025

Alternatively we can map Kotlin Primitives to JavaType.Primitive, instead of the Java.Class instances they are now; That would mean recipes written for Java that might use these primitives in their method patterns would match again. We could extend this to only do so for types coming from Java if needed / desired, but there does not appear to be an easy way to tell them apart from the conflicting signals coming back on the declared type (Java classes have super type kotlin.Any for instance). Let's agree to this approach before I update the failures in

@timtebeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Any thoughts as to the kotlin.Int mapping to int here @knutwannheden ? I feel that would help recipe reuse across languages..

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some suggestions could not be made:

  • src/test/java/org/openrewrite/kotlin/ChangeTypeTest.java
    • lines 18-18

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working parser-kotlin
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant