-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: gender neutral editorials, closes https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues/123 #143
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thank you for doing the PR! the current text looks good.
I found one more occurrence of "her". Would it be possible to also fix a sentence in the first security considerations section
from
The Credential Issuer MAY want to ensure that private keys are properly protected from exfiltration and replay to prevent an adversary from impersonating the legitimate Credential holder by presenting her Credential.
to something like?
The Credential Issuer MAY want to ensure that private keys are properly protected from exfiltration and replay to prevent an adversary from impersonating the legitimate Credential holders by presenting their Credentials.
oh yes, done @Sakurann |
Missing pronouns: Line #1675: Use Case: Credential Offer - Cross-Device (with Information Pre-Submitted by the End-User) I believe, it does not matter whether or not the User receives the transaction code on the same smartphone, so I suggest to remove that part.
|
Missing pronoun: Line #1685: Wallet Initiated Issuance during Presentation "her Wallet" => "the Wallet"; Avoid duplicate wording at the beginning of a clause ("upon being authenticated").
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor editorial changes, but with those applied I'm happy to approve
Co-authored-by: Judith <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tobias Looker <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As I wrote in the corresponding issue, use of "they" to refer to a single person is grammatically incorrect. The correct way to not use "he" or "she" is to remove the pronouns entirely, replacing them with descriptive phrases like "the End-User".
Please do this. We should not knowingly introduce grammar errors into the specification.
@@ -1668,27 +1668,27 @@ This is a non-exhaustive list of sample use cases. | |||
|
|||
## Credential Offer - Same-Device {#use-case-3} | |||
|
|||
While browsing the university's home page, the End-User finds a link "request your digital diploma". The End-User clicks on this link and is being redirected to a digital Wallet. The Wallet notifies the End-User that a Credential Issuer offered to issue a diploma Credential. User confirms this inquiry and is taken to the university's Credential issuance service's End-User experience. After authenticating at the university and consenting to the issuance of a digital diploma, the End-User is sent back to the Wallet, where she can check the successful creation of the digital diploma. | |||
While browsing the university's home page, the End-User finds a link "request your digital diploma". The End-User clicks on this link and is being redirected to a digital Wallet. The Wallet notifies the End-User that a Credential Issuer offered to issue a diploma Credential. User confirms this inquiry and is taken to the university's Credential issuance service's End-User experience. Upon successful authentication at the university and consent to the issuance of a digital diploma, the End-User is redirected back to the Wallet. Here, the End-User can verify the successful creation of the digital diploma. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While browsing the university's home page, the End-User finds a link "request your digital diploma". The End-User clicks on this link and is being redirected to a digital Wallet. The Wallet notifies the End-User that a Credential Issuer offered to issue a diploma Credential. User confirms this inquiry and is taken to the university's Credential issuance service's End-User experience. Upon successful authentication at the university and consent to the issuance of a digital diploma, the End-User is redirected back to the Wallet. Here, the End-User can verify the successful creation of the digital diploma. | |
While browsing the university's home page, the End-User finds a link "request your digital diploma". The End-User clicks on this link and is being redirected to a digital Wallet. The Wallet notifies the End-User that a Credential Issuer offered to issue a diploma Credential. End-User confirms this inquiry and is taken to the university's Credential issuance service's End-User experience. Upon successful authentication at the university and consent to the issuance of a digital diploma, the End-User is redirected back to the Wallet. Here, the End-User can verify the successful creation of the digital diploma. |
I don't think this is incorrect anymore, or at least rapidly changing, with a lot of people choosing to use "they" as a pronoun pointing to an individual. |
I didn't attended the editor's call, and probably I don't know the details behind this discussion. I just want to say that I removed any "he/she/they" related to human subjects and I can continue doing this if you would kindly point me in the text where these pronouns are, if I miss some of them |
@@ -1250,7 +1250,7 @@ This specification also defines a new OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server metadata [@ | |||
|
|||
Credential Issuers often want to know what Wallet they are issuing Credentials to and how private keys are managed for the following reasons: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Credential Issuers often want to know what Wallet they are issuing Credentials to and how private keys are managed for the following reasons: | |
Credential Issuers needs to know the Wallet that is receiving the Credentials and the security measures in place for managing private keys, for the following reasons: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the original text honestly sounds ok..
@@ -1250,7 +1250,7 @@ This specification also defines a new OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server metadata [@ | |||
|
|||
Credential Issuers often want to know what Wallet they are issuing Credentials to and how private keys are managed for the following reasons: | |||
|
|||
* The Credential Issuer MAY want to ensure that private keys are properly protected from exfiltration and replay to prevent an adversary from impersonating the legitimate Credential holder by presenting her Credential. | |||
* The Credential Issuer MAY want to ensure that private keys are properly protected from exfiltration and replay to prevent an adversary from impersonating the legitimate Credential Holders by presenting their Credentials. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* The Credential Issuer MAY want to ensure that private keys are properly protected from exfiltration and replay to prevent an adversary from impersonating the legitimate Credential Holders by presenting their Credentials. | |
* The Credential Issuer MAY want to ensure that private keys are adequately protected against exfiltration and replay. This precaution helps prevent adversaries from impersonating legitimate Credential Holders and presenting the Credentials. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the original text is grammatically correct, too :).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm neutral, I only have tried to resolve the pending comments. If the authors agreed they may reject or merge this last suggestion, no worries.
@selfissued I have added some additional rewording in the desperate will to remove any concerning element. Please review |
@selfissued can you please point to the specific instances of the usage of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM now - thanks
This PR closes #123