[fix] Fix invalid YAMLs in CRDs

[nilroy]

Pull Request template

Please, go through these steps before you submit a PR.

Why is this PR required? What issue does it fix?:
This fixes the invalid YAMLs in CRDs. It is a continuation from this PR
What this PR does?:

Does this PR require any upgrade changes?:

If the changes in this PR are manually verified, list down the scenarios covered::

Any additional information for your reviewer? :
Mention if this PR is part of any design or a continuation of previous PRs

Checklist:

• Fixes #
• PR Title follows the convention of <type>(<scope>): <subject>
• Has the change log section been updated?
• Commit has unit tests
• Commit has integration tests
• (Optional) Are upgrade changes included in this PR? If not, mention the issue/PR to track:
• (Optional) If documentation changes are required, which issue on https://github.com/openebs/website is used to track them:

PLEASE REMOVE BELOW INFORMATION BEFORE SUBMITTING

The PR title message must follow convention:
<type>(<scope>): <subject>.

Where:

• type is defining if release will be triggering after merging submitted changes, details in CONTRIBUTING.md.
  Most common types are:

  • feat - for new features, not a new feature for build script
  • fix - for bug fixes or improvements, not a fix for build script
  • chore - changes not related to production code
  • docs - changes related to documentation
  • style - formatting, missing semi colons, linting fix etc; no significant production code changes
  • test - adding missing tests, refactoring tests; no production code change
  • refactor - refactoring production code, eg. renaming a variable or function name, there should not be any significant production code changes

• scope is a single word that best describes where the changes fit.
  Most common scopes are like:

  • data engine (localpv, jiva, cstor)
  • feature (provisioning, backup, restore, exporter)
  • code component (api, webhook, cast, upgrade)
  • test (tests, bdd)
  • chores (version, build, log, travis)

• subject is a single line brief description of the changes made in the pull request.

[Abhinandan-Purkait]

Chart lint failure. @nilroy Please check.

[nilroy]

Chart lint failure. @nilroy Please check.

@Abhinandan-Purkait I don't know what are the linting issue. I just copied the files from PR where the linting is passing. Could you help a bit here?

[tiagolobocastro]

Chart lint failure. @nilroy Please check.

@Abhinandan-Purkait I don't know what are the linting issue. I just copied the files from PR where the linting is passing. Could you help a bit here?

Looks like a bug on our chart-testing tool. Could you please remove the helm-extra-args line from ct.yaml? Should hopefully be enough to get your PR passing for now.

[nilroy]

Chart lint failure. @nilroy Please check.

@Abhinandan-Purkait I don't know what are the linting issue. I just copied the files from PR where the linting is passing. Could you help a bit here?

Looks like a bug on our chart-testing tool. Could you please remove the helm-extra-args line from ct.yaml? Should hopefully be enough to get your PR passing for now.

@tiagolobocastro Thanks for the pointer. Done that in 49bd37e

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.27%. Comparing base (8c402d3) to head (5153952).
Report is 36 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #620      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    95.99%   95.27%   -0.72%     
===========================================
  Files            1        1              
  Lines          574      593      +19     
===========================================
+ Hits           551      565      +14     
- Misses          19       23       +4     
- Partials         4        5       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
bddtests	95.27% <ø> (-0.72%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.