-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add windnet model #155
add windnet model #155
Conversation
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ def get_generation_data( | |||
if client == "ruvnl": | |||
start = timestamp - dt.timedelta(hours=1) | |||
elif client == "ad": | |||
start = timestamp - dt.timedelta(hours=3) | |||
start = timestamp - dt.timedelta(hours=25) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this change because of data quality issues or we are using a lot more wind history?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Had a look at https://huggingface.co/openclimatefix/windnet_ad_sites/blob/main/data_config.yaml and have answered my own question, makes sense since we have a day of wind history
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are using a bunch f wind history yeah, over a day
Pull Request
Description
Deploy wind net for ad sites
#156
How Has This Been Tested?
CI tests + ran locally
Checklist: