Draft minutes 2025-01-14 #130
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Michael Baentsch <[email protected]>
christianpaquin
approved these changes
Jan 16, 2025
SWilson4
reviewed
Jan 16, 2025
| - General agreement that it would need more commitment, particularly by the commercial entities to improve OQS; Hart and Douglas to take this to the GB | ||
| - General consensus that the committer base must be broadened | ||
| 9. Other business. | ||
| - Agreement to try to bring more NIST on-ramp algorithm authors to contribute (Hart already reaching out; Basil pointing out that second round closes in February; Douglas stating his reach out had limited success) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I seem to remember the "limited success" here referring to attempts to reach out in previous iterations of the NIST selection process, as opposed to the signature on-ramp. Not sure if I understood correctly or not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Indeed; I've just commented with a revision that reflects what I intended to say (although perhaps it didn't come across that way in the meeting)
dstebila
reviewed
Jan 21, 2025
| - General agreement that it would need more commitment, particularly by the commercial entities to improve OQS; Hart and Douglas to take this to the GB | ||
| - General consensus that the committer base must be broadened | ||
| 9. Other business. | ||
| - Agreement to try to bring more NIST on-ramp algorithm authors to contribute (Hart already reaching out; Basil pointing out that second round closes in February; Douglas stating his reach out had limited success) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| - Agreement to try to bring more NIST on-ramp algorithm authors to contribute (Hart already reaching out; Basil pointing out that second round closes in February; Douglas stating his reach out had limited success) | |
| - Agreement to try to bring more NIST on-ramp algorithm authors to contribute (Hart already reaching out; Basil pointing out that second round closes in February; Douglas stating that efforts to get contributions from NIST submission teams from the original PQC rounds 1/2/3 had limited success for teams we didn't already have a strong connection with) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.