Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Saffron: initial README #2989

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Saffron: initial README #2989

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

dannywillems
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@dannywillems dannywillems force-pushed the saffron-readme branch 2 times, most recently from f5d2e37 to f0c0ac0 Compare February 3, 2025 19:24
@dannywillems dannywillems requested a review from martyall February 3, 2025 19:25
@martyall
Copy link
Contributor

martyall commented Feb 3, 2025

Great! I hope you don't mind, but I pushed a small change directly to this branch RE invoking the e2e test. It also seemed like a good time to name the script what it actually is 🙃

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.15%. Comparing base (22a9862) to head (84a357a).
Report is 73 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2989      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.95%   77.15%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files         261      260       -1     
  Lines       61457    61529      +72     
==========================================
+ Hits        47293    47470     +177     
+ Misses      14164    14059     -105     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dannywillems dannywillems merged commit 99d7aa5 into master Feb 4, 2025
13 checks passed
@dannywillems dannywillems deleted the saffron-readme branch February 4, 2025 06:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants