Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: document u128 feature #4225
chore: document u128 feature #4225
Changes from 1 commit
27775ea
09f0afe
ee35078
da7f6c1
9a2f741
a900d33
fbe8620
660e5d5
03fbdac
25cb8a3
3ae25ac
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a question here @guipublic don't all casts to unsigned integers have a performance cost? I was under that impression (because range checks).
Is this cost simply higher than usual? If not, we should maybe point to the performance cost at the top of the page and remove this one to avoid confusion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no cast for U128, as explained in the doc, so I am not sure to understand your question.
In term of performance, converting an integer to U128 will have no cost (because U128 is the biggest), and converting to a lower bit size will not have a specific drawback because of U128, just what you should expect.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess what @signorecello meant was working with native
uint
s is less performant than working withField
s.This section reads like performance costs would rank as
U128
> nativeuint
>Field
.Is that the correct way to understand it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the higher the bit size, the higher is the cost. But because U128 uses 2 limbs, cost of arithmetic operations are even higher, especially for multiplication.