Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Tensor] Proposal for unifying tensor addition: remove add_i implementation #2858

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

djeong20
Copy link
Contributor

@djeong20 djeong20 commented Jan 7, 2025

This pull request proposes the removal of the add_i implementation and its unification with the add function.
Currently, the use of two distinct kernels for tensor addition can result in performance inefficiencies.
To enhance overall performance, it is crucial to address this issue.
Additionally, we must undertake follow-up work to integrate ele_add and sxapy successfully.

Self-evaluation:

  1. Build test: [X]Passed [ ]Failed [ ]Skipped
  2. Run test: [X]Passed [ ]Failed [ ]Skipped

…ation

This pull request proposes the removal of the add_i implementation and its unification with the add function. Currently, the use of two distinct kernels for tensor addition can result in performance inefficiencies. To enhance overall performance, it is crucial to address this issue. Additionally, we will need to undertake follow-up work to successfully integrate ele_add and sxapy.

**Self-evaluation:**
1. Build test: [X]Passed [ ]Failed [ ]Skipped
2. Run test:   [X]Passed [ ]Failed [ ]Skipped

Signed-off-by: Donghyeon Jeong <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@skykongkong8 skykongkong8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggestion for the follow-up work proposed from here is at #2862

Copy link
Contributor

@EunjuYang EunjuYang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants