src/mini_selector/extension.rs: update

[niklak]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Streamlined internal processing to enhance efficiency and consistency in handling selections. These improvements maintain the current functionality while ensuring a more robust and predictable operation behind the scenes.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This change refactors the find_descendant_ids function in the mini-selector module by removing extraneous comments and modifying the candidate handling logic. Instead of appending new candidates to the existing stack, the function now reassigns the stack to the current candidates. The depth-first traversal approach remains intact, and there are no changes to public or exported entities.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/mini_selector/extension.rs	Removed misleading comments and updated the candidate management in find_descendant_ids by reassigning the stack to the current candidate set.

Possibly related PRs

• src/mini_selector/extension.rs: rename snap_is -> mini_is, `snap_… #75: Renamed core functions (from snap_is/snap_match to mini_is/mini_match), directly impacting related selector functionality.
• Implemented mini_selector feature #72: Made adjustments to the find_descendant_ids function that align with new methods for descendant searches.
• added NodeRef::descendants #39: Introduced new descendant handling methods which interact closely with the logic modified in this PR.

Poem

I hopped through lines of code with glee,
Cleaning up the comments so free,
Resetting the stack with a thoughtful stride,
Traversing the nodes on a joyful ride,
In my digital burrow, changes bloom bright—
A rabbit's delight in code’s soft light!

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 37f7270 and bac5b20.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/mini_selector/extension.rs (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)

• GitHub Check: test
• GitHub Check: test-wasm

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/mini_selector/extension.rs (1)

61-61: Improved handling of candidates in the selector matching algorithm.

The change from (what I infer was) stack.extend(candidates) to stack = candidates is a significant improvement. This ensures that only nodes matching the current selector will be considered for the next selector in the list, which is exactly how CSS selector sequences should work. The original approach may have accumulated nodes incorrectly, leading to potential false matches.

This change better implements the CSS selector sequence logic where each selector filters the results of the previous one, particularly for combinators like descendant and child selectors.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.53%. Comparing base (37f7270) to head (bac5b20).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #77      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.54%   94.53%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines        4011     4010       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         3792     3791       -1     
  Misses        219      219              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.