src/node/node_ref.rs: update

[niklak]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved node matching logic to prevent processing non-element nodes

• Tests

  • Introduced new test case for text node identification and matching

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a modification to the is_match method in the NodeRef struct, adding a preliminary check to ensure only element nodes are processed by the matcher. A corresponding test case is added to tests/node-traversal.rs to verify the behavior of text nodes, specifically checking that a text node does not match a particular selector when compiled for the wasm32 target.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/node/node_ref.rs	Modified is_match method to add self.is_element() check before calling matcher
tests/node-traversal.rs	Added new test function test_text_node_is() for text node selector behavior

Possibly related PRs

• implemented NodeRef::is_match and NodeRef::is #53: Modification of is_match method in NodeRef struct, sharing similar implementation changes to node matching logic

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of node selection,
Where elements dance with matcher's reflection
Text nodes now wait behind the gate
No match for them, a selective fate!
Code hops with precision, clear and bright 🌟

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 180d641 and 78a7614.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• src/node/node_ref.rs (1 hunks)
• tests/node-traversal.rs (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (4)

tests/node-traversal.rs (3)

234-236: No meaningful change.
These lines appear to be blank or simply close the previous function.

---

237-239: Good test function definition.
Introducing another conditionally-compiled test function helps maintain consistent testing across host and WASM environments.

---

240-247: Well-structured test for text nodes.
This addition confirms that text nodes do not match a specific selector, which is consistent with the recent is_element check in is_match. This test improves coverage and helps prevent regression in node-type handling.

src/node/node_ref.rs (1)

648-648: Ensuring is_element() check before matching.
Inserting self.is_element() before calling matcher.match_element(self) is a sensible safeguard to avoid invalid matches on non-element nodes.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.56%. Comparing base (180d641) to head (78a7614).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #54   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.56%   91.56%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines        2490     2490           
=======================================
  Hits         2280     2280           
  Misses        210      210           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.