IS-2985: Update publishedAt for Foresporsel #17
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eirikdahlen
commented
Jan 7, 2025
src/test/kotlin/no/nav/syfo/application/ForesporselServiceTest.kt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
geir-waagboe
approved these changes
Jan 7, 2025
|
Snakket litt med Geir - vi tenker å publisere i cronjob. Så da endrer jeg bare denne PRen til å inkludere repo-funksjonen, og ikke implementerer den i servicen enda. |
eirikdahlen
force-pushed
the
IS-2985-repository-publishedAt
branch
from
9aff3d2 to
61f7368
Compare
eirikdahlen
force-pushed
the
IS-2985-repository-publishedAt
branch
from
61f7368 to
93a2c29
Compare
andersrognstad
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Lagde repo-funksjon for å endre
published_atog tok det i bruk i servicen for å sende til nærmeste leder.La inn en kommentar som vi kan diskutere. Vet ikke om vi har testet for at
published_atfaktisk har oppdatert seg i disse tilfellene før.