-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move CI to github actions #433
Conversation
544b006
to
42d21ab
Compare
- name: Set up Docker Buildx | ||
uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3 | ||
|
||
- name: Login to Docker Hub |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want to avoid going via docker hub soon and only go via ghcr? You'll need to arrange a new dockerhub account otherwise, and they will definitely consider Avenir commercial
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, expecting we can remove this soon. I'll get deployment working off ghcr and then can remove this
DESCRIPTION
Outdated
mrc-ide/mockr, | ||
mrc-ide/testthat.buildkite, | ||
duckdb/[email protected] | ||
mrc-ide/naomi.options |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this not on the universe?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is, removed that line.
NAMESPACE
Outdated
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ | |||
# Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand | |||
|
|||
S3method(naomi::print,naomi_areas) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is odd for two reasons:
- does
print
not work as the generic? - should naomi not implement this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, think this was me not understanding when you should use @exportS3method
over @export
. Have updated this to @export
now which I think is correct (from https://roxygen2.r-lib.org/articles/namespace.html#s3) I've fixed the signature too to actually match print
.
R/areas.R
Outdated
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ create_areas <- function(levels = NULL, hierarchy = NULL, boundaries = NULL, | |||
v | |||
} | |||
|
|||
#' @exportS3Method naomi::print |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see comments in NAMESPACE
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
## Naomi <img src='images/naomi_hex.png' align="right" height="139" /> | |||
|
|||
[![Travis build status](https://travis-ci.org/mrc-ide/naomi.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/mrc-ide/naomi) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh my
docker/teamcity
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so much archaeology...
Co-authored-by: Rich FitzJohn <[email protected]>
In moving this to Avenir we'll no longer have access to the buildkite runners. We can use github actions free runners to achieve what we need instead.
This PR will