Clarify usage of return values in iterator protocol #37511
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
There's an example with an iterable that returns an iterator that enumerates 1, 2, and returns with
{done: true, value: 3}
, and is evaluated withconst [b, c, d] = obj
.It takes a careful reading to notice that the third value is used only to ensure that the iterator is exhausted and that the value from the iterator return is not bound to
d
.Motivation
Since the example is "Returning 3" in the comment above when
next()
returns{done:true, value: 3}
a reader may think that3
is bound tod
in this case. With this comment, it will be easier to see that the value returned by an exhausted iterator is not used in any normal scenario, including array destructuring.Additional details
N/A
Related issues and pull requests
N/A