add solution

[tiblazy]

No description provided.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

---

Hello! 😊 It looks like your implementation of the transformStateWithClones function is almost there, but there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve the pull request:

1. Use of switch Statement: The current code uses if statements to handle different action types, but the task requires a switch statement. This is important for readability and maintainability when dealing with a limited number of conditions.

2. Default Case in switch: When using a switch statement, it's a good practice to include a default case for error handling. This ensures that any unexpected actions are handled gracefully.

3. Pushing State Copies: The line response.push(stateInAction); should be moved outside of the switch block, to the end of each loop cycle. This ensures that the state is correctly captured after each action is processed.

These changes are necessary to meet the core requirements of the task and ensure the functionality of your code. Once these issues are resolved, your solution should be good to go! Keep up the great work, and don't hesitate to reach out if you need any help. 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

Review Summary

Great job on implementing the transformStateWithClones function! 🎉 You've successfully used a switch statement to handle different action types, which was a critical requirement. The inclusion of a default case to handle unexpected action types is a smart move, ensuring robustness in your code.

Here are a few points to consider for improvement:

1. Pushing State Copies: Ensure that response.push(stateInAction); is executed after processing each action. It's correctly placed outside the switch block, but make sure it's at the end of each loop cycle to capture the state accurately.

2. Copying State: You're correctly using the spread operator to copy the state, which prevents mutation of the original state. Keep up this good practice!

3. Naming: The variable stateInAction is well-named and descriptive, aligning with good naming conventions.

Overall, your implementation meets the task requirements and constraints. While there are some minor issues to address, the decision to approve your Pull Request is made to help you move forward with your learning journey. Please review the comments to refine your code further. Remember, addressing these issues will help you avoid similar problems in the future. Keep up the great work and continue learning from your experiences! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨