Solution #4238
Solution #4238
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your hard work on this Pull Request! 😊 While your solution is mostly on the right track, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve it.
-
Switch Statement Usage: The task requires using a
switchstatement for handlingaction.type, but the current implementation usesif-elsestatements. Please convert these to aswitchstatement and include adefaultcase for error handling. -
Pushing State Copies: The current implementation pushes
currentStatedirectly to thestatesarray within the conditional blocks. According to the task requirements, it's crucial to push a copy of the state after processing each action, outside of theswitchblock. This ensures that the state is accurately captured after all modifications.
Once these changes are made, your code will meet the task requirements and constraints. Keep up the great work, and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.
| delete currentState[key]; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| states.push(currentState); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The current state is being pushed into the states array inside the loop but within the conditional blocks. According to the additional prompt, it is better to push a copy of the object to the array at the end of each loop cycle, but outside of the switch block, after the current action is processed. Consider moving this line outside of the conditional blocks to ensure the state is captured after all modifications for the current action are complete.
No description provided.