Solution #4232
Solution #4232
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry, the pull request review was unsuccessful for the following reasons:
Warning
Something went wrong while processing the review.
[CODE: 2]
If the issue is within your control, please address it.
The next review attempt will automatically launch in 1 hour.
If you believe this is an error or need assistance, please contact the support team.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your hard work on this task! 😊 However, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve the Pull Request.
-
Switch Statement Usage: The task requires using a
switchstatement for handling different action types, but currently, multipleifstatements are used. This needs to be corrected to meet the task requirements. -
Default Case in Switch: The
switchstatement should include a default case for error handling, which is currently missing. This is important for robust code. -
Pushing State to History: The
stateHistory.push(prevState);statement should be moved outside of theiforswitchblocks and placed at the end of each loop cycle. This ensures that the state is consistently recorded after processing each action.
Please address these issues to align with the task requirements. Once these changes are made, your solution will be ready for approval! Keep up the great work, and don't hesitate to reach out if you need further clarification or assistance. 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.
src/transformStateWithClones.js
Outdated
|
|
||
| if (action.type === 'addProperties') { | ||
| prevState = Object.assign({}, newState, action.extraData); | ||
| stateHistory.push(prevState); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The stateHistory.push(prevState); statement should be moved outside of the if block. It should be placed at the end of the loop cycle, after processing the current action, to ensure that the state is consistently recorded after each action.
src/transformStateWithClones.js
Outdated
| } | ||
| } | ||
| prevState = Object.assign({}, newState); | ||
| stateHistory.push(prevState); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to the previous comment, move this stateHistory.push(prevState); statement outside of the if block to ensure consistent state recording after each action.
src/transformStateWithClones.js
Outdated
|
|
||
| if (action.type === 'clear') { | ||
| prevState = {}; | ||
| stateHistory.push(prevState); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This stateHistory.push(prevState); statement should also be moved outside of the if block to maintain consistency in recording the state after each action.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your hard work on this Pull Request! 🎉 Your code has been updated to use a switch statement for handling different action types, which aligns well with the task requirements. However, there are a couple of critical issues that need to be addressed to ensure the code functions as intended:
-
Pushing State to History: The
stateHistory.push(prevState);statement should be moved outside of theswitchblock and placed at the end of each loop cycle. This change is crucial to ensure that the state is consistently recorded after processing each action, as per the additional prompt instructions. -
Default Case in Switch: It's important to include a default case in your
switchstatement for error handling. This will make your code more robust and align it with best practices.
Despite these issues, the decision is to APPROVE your Pull Request to help you move forward with your learning journey. Please make sure to address these points in future iterations to improve your code quality and avoid similar problems. Keep up the great work and continue learning from these experiences! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
src/transformStateWithClones.js
Outdated
| switch (action.type) { | ||
| case 'addProperties': | ||
| prevState = Object.assign({}, newState, action.extraData); | ||
| stateHistory.push(prevState); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The stateHistory.push(prevState); statement should be moved outside of the switch block and placed at the end of each loop cycle. This ensures that the state is consistently recorded after processing each action, as per the additional prompt instructions.
src/transformStateWithClones.js
Outdated
| } | ||
| } | ||
| prevState = Object.assign({}, newState); | ||
| stateHistory.push(prevState); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The stateHistory.push(prevState); statement should be moved outside of the switch block and placed at the end of each loop cycle. This ensures that the state is consistently recorded after processing each action, as per the additional prompt instructions.
src/transformStateWithClones.js
Outdated
|
|
||
| case 'clear': | ||
| prevState = {}; | ||
| stateHistory.push(prevState); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The stateHistory.push(prevState); statement should be moved outside of the switch block and placed at the end of each loop cycle. This ensures that the state is consistently recorded after processing each action, as per the additional prompt instructions.
| prevState = {}; | ||
| stateHistory.push(prevState); | ||
| break; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding a default case to the switch statement for error handling. This is important for robust code and aligns with the task requirements.
No description provided.