Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add task solution #4228

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alex-marcovych
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.


Thank you for your hard work on this Pull Request! 😊 While your implementation is on the right track, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed to fully meet the task requirements:

  1. Switch Statement Usage: The task requires using a switch statement for handling different action types. Currently, if statements are used, which does not align with the requirements.

  2. Default Case: Your implementation lacks a default case for error handling in the switch statement. It's important to include this to handle unexpected action types gracefully.

  3. State Recording: The state copies are being pushed inside each if block. To ensure the state is recorded once per action, this should be done outside the switch block, after processing each action.

Addressing these issues will help ensure your code meets the core requirements and functions as expected. Keep up the great work, and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.

for (const action of actions) {
if (action.type === 'addProperties') {
Object.assign(newState, action.extraData);
stateHistory.push({ ...newState });

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of pushing the new state inside each action type block, consider moving this line outside of the if statements to ensure the state is recorded once per action. This aligns with the guidance to push a copy of the object at the end of each loop cycle.

for (const key of action.keysToRemove) {
delete newState[key];
}
stateHistory.push({ ...newState });

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similar to the previous comment, this line should be moved outside of the if statements to ensure the state is recorded once per action.

for (const key in newState) {
delete newState[key];
}
stateHistory.push({ ...newState });

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line should also be moved outside of the if statements to ensure the state is recorded once per action.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job on implementing the transformStateWithClones function! 🎉 Your code meets the core task requirements, including the correct use of a switch statement with a default case for error handling, and proper state recording by pushing state copies to the stateHistory array.

However, there are a few areas for improvement to ensure your logic aligns perfectly with the intended functionality. Make sure to review the logic inside each case of the switch statement to ensure it matches the task requirements.

The decision to approve your pull request is made to help you move forward with your learning journey. Please take the time to review the comments and improve your code. Addressing these issues will enhance your skills and help you avoid similar problems in the future. Keep up the good work and continue learning from these experiences! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants