Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify vendor data and corrections #31

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jan 27, 2025
Merged

Simplify vendor data and corrections #31

merged 12 commits into from
Jan 27, 2025

Conversation

benjay10
Copy link
Collaborator

[DL-6328]

Documentation updates that go alongside the simplifications of the Vendor API model in Loket.

Main changes include:

  • Updated diagrams to correspond to the model in table form
  • Rewording of predicate names
  • Removed uuid from the models, the vendor has no use of them
  • Added a missing property on the SubmissionDocument
  • Updated the snippet for downloading attachments: there is already a downloadlink in the vendor data on Worship Submissions Database.

No more data that is not in the Vendor API anymore.
As far as I can see, not all Submissions have a nie:hasPart.
Properties with nicer names.
And reworded the introduction to make more clear that this is all the
data that will be presented in the API.
Moved the snippet file to the correct folder and correct the hostname,
and used the download URL in the triplestore. No need for manual
calculations.
@benjay10 benjay10 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 24, 2025
@benjay10 benjay10 requested a review from cecemel January 24, 2025 02:44
Copy link
Member

@cecemel cecemel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, can you also deploy this?

@benjay10 benjay10 merged commit 92346e1 into master Jan 27, 2025
@benjay10 benjay10 deleted the simplify-vendor-data branch January 27, 2025 09:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants