no message

langsci · Feb 7, 2022 · 9a73c3b · 9a73c3b
1 parent e14fe85
commit 9a73c3b
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 8 changed files with 235 additions and 181 deletions.
diff --git a/broken-dois.txt b/broken-dois.txt
@@ -20,3 +20,10 @@ https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198621.185
 
 
 https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110198621/html
+
+The Linguistic Review 1983 Heft 3 fehlt komplett
+
+
+Behaghel 1909:
+https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110242652.110
+
diff --git a/chapters/edition2.tex b/chapters/edition2.tex
@@ -15,6 +15,20 @@ \section*{Foreword of the second edition}
 % relative-clauses.tex 05.01.22
 % \trace -> \trace{}
 % glosses aligned in {x:rc-129}
+% added language tag
+% fixed index entry for Bavarian German
+
+
+% 18.01.22 added language info for German examples
+
+% 25.01.22 Footnote~\ref{fn-hf-schema} was missing. % in udc
+
+% 03.02.22 Idioms: NP in (8) too much, REL bad feature name, ref to Krenn&Erbach added
+
+~\medskip
+
+\noindent
+Berlin, \today\hfill Stefan Müller, Anne Abeillé, Robert D. Borsley \& Jean-Pierre Koenig
 
 
 %      <!-- Local IspellDict: en_US-w_accents -->
diff --git a/chapters/preface.tex b/chapters/preface.tex
@@ -97,6 +97,14 @@ \section*{\acknowledgmentsUS}
 Sašo for the intense collaboration that led to a package of great value for everybody
 living in the woods.
 
+%~\medskip
+
+%\noindent
+Berlin, Paris, Bangor, Buffalo, November 9, 2021\hfill Stefan Müller, Anne Abeillé, Robert D. Borsley \& Jean-Pierre Koenig
+
+
+\input{chapters/edition2}
+
 \section*{Abbreviations and feature names used in the book}
 
 \begin{longtable}{@{}p{3cm}p{9cm}@{}}
@@ -235,7 +243,7 @@ \section*{Abbreviations and feature names used in the book}
 \feat{ragr} & right conjunct agreement \\
 \feat{realized} & realized syntactic argument \\
 \feat{rel} & indices for relatives \\
-\feat{rln} (\feat{rel}) & semantic relation \\
+\feat{rln} (\feat{reln}) & semantic relation \\
 \feat{rels} & list or set of semantic relations \\
 \feat{rest} & non-first members of a list \\
 \feat{restr} & restriction of quantifier (in MRS) \\

diff --git a/chapters/relative-clauses.tex b/chapters/relative-clauses.tex
@@ -1316,10 +1316,11 @@ \subsection{Complementiser relatives}
 section we look first at \ili{Arabic}, where a complementiser analysis has been proposed and
 then at \ili{English}, where such an analysis seems possible for some cases, but where it is
 controversial. We also discuss an interesting construction in \ili{French}.\footnote{There are also cases which involve a \isi{relative pronoun} \emph{and} a
-  complementiser, as in the following from \citegen{Hinrichs:Nakazawa:02} discussion of \ili{Bavarian} \ili{German}:
+  complementiser, as in the following from \citegen{Hinrichs:Nakazawa:02} discussion of
+  Bavarian German\il{German!Bavarian}:
   \begin{exe}
     \ex \gll der Mantl (den) wo i kaffd hob\\
-    the coat \hphantom{(}which that I bought have\\\jambox*{(\ili{Bavarian} \ili{German})}
+    the coat \hphantom{(}which that I bought have\\\jambox*{(Bavarian German\il{German!Bavarian})}
     \glt `the coat which I bought’
   \end{exe}
   \citet{Hinrichs:Nakazawa:02} analyse these as \lic{wh}-relatives,\is{relative
@@ -1692,9 +1693,10 @@ \subsubsection{French}
 and \emph{combien} 'how much' is extracted from its CP complement.  
 
 \ea
+\longexampleandlanguage{
 \gll un {homme politique} dont     on vérifie combien  la société   déclare qu  'il   a   été  payé\\
      a  politician        of.which we check   how.much the company  states  that he   has been
-     paid\\
+     paid\\}{French}
 %
 % Stefan: grammatical but too far away from the original
 % JP: Take this one
@@ -1965,7 +1967,7 @@ \subsubsection{Bare relatives in English}
     modal infinitives like (\mex{1}).
   \ea 
   \gll ein zu lesendes Buch\\
-       a to read book\\
+       a to read book\\ \jambox*{(\ili{German})}
   \glt `a book to be read'
   \z
   Müller’s discussion also omits discussion of the semantics, but it seems clear that the

diff --git a/chapters/semantics.tex b/chapters/semantics.tex
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ \section{A situation semantics beginning}
 semantic classification of types of NPs, something that HPSG's Binding Theory makes use of
 \crossrefchapterp[Section~\ref{binding:sec-a-non-configurational-binding-theory}]{binding}.
 
-Parameters also play an important role in early accounts of quantification; these accounts rely on restrictions on parameters that constrain how variables are anchored, akin to predicative conditions on discourse referents in Discourse Representation Theory \citep{KampandReyle1993}. Restrictions on parameters are illustrated with (\ref{donkey}), the (non-empty) semantic content of the common noun \word{donkey}, where the variable \ibox{1} is restricted to individuals that are donkeys, as expressed by the value of the attribute \attrib{rest}.\footnote{In \citet{PollardandSag1987}, which we discuss here, semantic relations are the values of a \attrib{reln} attribute and restrictions are single semantic relations rather than set-valued. To ensure historical accuracy, we use the feature geometry that was used at the time.}
+Parameters also play an important role in early accounts of quantification; these accounts rely on restrictions on parameters that constrain how variables are anchored, akin to predicative conditions on discourse referents in Discourse Representation Theory \citep{KampandReyle1993}. Restrictions on parameters are illustrated with (\ref{donkey}), the (non-empty) semantic content of the common noun \word{donkey}, where the variable \ibox{1} is restricted to individuals that are donkeys, as expressed by the value of the attribute \attrib{rest}.\footnote{In \citet{PollardandSag1987}, which we discuss here, semantic relations are the values of a \attrib{reln}\isfeat{reln} attribute and restrictions are single semantic relations rather than set-valued. To ensure historical accuracy, we use the feature geometry that was used at the time.}
 
 \begin{exe}
 \ex\label{donkey}