Fix no codeblock error by re-prompting to LLM's incomplete response #436
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
devjpt23
force-pushed
the
fixing-no-codeblock-error
branch
2 times, most recently
from
eb11cc1 to
5605266
Compare
devjpt23
force-pushed
the
fixing-no-codeblock-error
branch
5 times, most recently
from
2d15b9b to
19c2820
Compare
devjpt23
force-pushed
the
fixing-no-codeblock-error
branch
from
19c2820 to
8d204aa
Compare
devjpt23
force-pushed
the
fixing-no-codeblock-error
branch
5 times, most recently
from
4857944 to
24fb2eb
Compare
devjpt23
force-pushed
the
fixing-no-codeblock-error
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ae3955f to
13a94f9
Compare
devjpt23
changed the title
Signed-off-by: devjpt23 <[email protected]>
devjpt23
force-pushed
the
fixing-no-codeblock-error
branch
from
13a94f9 to
a839ba2
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The "No codeblocks" as faced in earlier in issue 350. The issue arises when the LLM responds without including two sets of triple backticks (```) in the updated file content.
To address this, this PR modifies
kai_application.pyso that if a response lacks proper code blocks and triggers the message "No codeblocks...", the system will automatically re-invoke the LLM, requesting a complete and properly formatted response.