Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CT-1894 add retry on BQ isTableExists #1431

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

CT-1894 add retry on BQ isTableExists #1431

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

zajca
Copy link
Member

@zajca zajca commented Dec 11, 2024

Jira: CT-1894
KBC: XXX

Before asking for review make sure that:

Checklist

  • New client method(s) has tests
  • New client method(s) support branches, or they are listed in BranchAwareClient
  • Apiary file is updated

Release

  • I gave the PR a proper label:
    • major (BC break)
    • minor (new feature)
    • patch (backwards compatible fix)
    • no release (just test changes)

@zajca zajca added the no release just test changes label Dec 11, 2024
@zajca zajca requested a review from romanbracinik December 11, 2024 14:09
romanbracinik
romanbracinik requested changes Dec 11, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@romanbracinik romanbracinik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cajk fixni prosim este ten stan

@zajca zajca requested a review from romanbracinik December 11, 2024 18:53
@zajca zajca merged commit 556f742 into master Dec 11, 2024
4 checks passed
@zajca zajca deleted the zajca-ct-1894 branch December 11, 2024 18:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@romanbracinik romanbracinik romanbracinik approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
no release just test changes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@zajca @romanbracinik