Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create .coderabbit.yaml #543

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: devel
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Create .coderabbit.yaml #543

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

kingster
Copy link
Collaborator

@kingster kingster commented Feb 12, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new configuration file that allows for language customization, streamlined review workflows (including auto-review, high-level summaries, and refined walkthrough behaviors), and enhanced chat interactions (auto-reply enabled).
    • Improved overall processing efficiency by filtering out non-essential file types.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 12, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request adds a new configuration file, .coderabbit.yaml, that specifies settings for a YAML language server. The file defines the schema for the configuration and sets parameters for language, early access features, review settings, path filters, auto-review options, and chat behavior. The configuration includes explicit options such as disabling early access, request changes in reviews, and poem generation while enabling high-level summaries, a review status, and an auto-reply chat feature.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.coderabbit.yaml Added new configuration file defining YAML language server settings including language (en-US), early access mode (disabled), review settings (profile "chill", disabled request changes, enabled high-level summaries, disabled poem generation, review enabled, walkthrough not collapsed), path filters for .lock and .patch files, auto-review (enabled, drafts false), and chat auto-reply (enabled).

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant LS as YAML Language Server
    participant CV as Config Loader
    participant RS as Review System
    participant CS as Chat System

    U->>CV: Initiate action
    CV->>LS: Load .coderabbit.yaml configuration
    LS->>LS: Parse configuration settings
    LS->>RS: Apply review settings (profile "chill", disable request changes, enable high-level summaries, etc.)
    LS->>CS: Apply chat auto-reply settings
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee1daea and 8bd5023.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest, 5.6)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest, 7.4)
  • GitHub Check: check-code (ubuntu-latest, 8.2)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)

1-19: Consider adding additional recommended settings.

While the current configuration is valid and functional, you might want to consider enabling these beneficial features:

  • reviews.changed_files_summary: true - Helps understand the scope of changes
  • reviews.sequence_diagrams: true - Visualizes code flow changes
  • reviews.assess_linked_issues: true - Validates changes against requirements

Add these settings to enhance the review experience:

 chat:
   auto_reply: true
+
+reviews:
+  changed_files_summary: true
+  sequence_diagrams: true
+  assess_linked_issues: true
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 428aa7d and ee1daea.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest, 7.4)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest, 7.3)
  • GitHub Check: check-code (ubuntu-latest, 8.2)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.coderabbit.yaml (3)

1-3: LGTM! Schema and basic settings are properly configured.

The schema URL is correctly specified, and the basic settings are valid according to the schema:

  • Language is set to "en-US" (supported value)
  • Early access features are explicitly disabled

4-16: LGTM! Review settings are well-configured for a balanced approach.

The review configuration demonstrates good practices:

  • Uses "chill" profile for balanced feedback
  • Enables high-level summaries and review status
  • Disables request changes workflow and poem generation
  • Excludes lock and patch files from review
  • Auto-review is enabled but skips draft PRs

17-18: LGTM! Chat settings are appropriately configured.

The chat configuration enables auto-reply, which will improve interaction efficiency.

@tenzap
Copy link
Collaborator

tenzap commented Feb 14, 2025

I'm not fond of AI (maybe by lack of knowledge and interest) but if you want.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants