Initial methods comparison table

[szhan]

Partially address #322

[szhan]

@jeromekelleher Any suggestions for the formatting? How should we encode N/A or recombinants with more than one breakpoint?

[jeromekelleher]

How many > 2 parent recombinants are there in Pango? It it's only a handful I would suggest we deal with them separately and focus for now on the two parent case. We can add in the extra columns or make a new table for the complex ones later if we like.

[jeromekelleher]

Can you group by pango, please, to make it easy to compare these directly in the table?

[szhan]

How many > 2 parent recombinants are there in Pango? It it's only a handful I would suggest we deal with them separately and focus for now on the two parent case. We can add in the extra columns or make a new table for the complex ones later if we like.

In the current alias key, there are:
Total Pango X: 144
One breakpoint: 123
More breakpoints: 21

[szhan]

Okay, I'll separate the one-breakpoint and more complex cases.

[jeromekelleher]

I think that's worthwhile, it'll help to analyse this relatively simple subset separately.

[jeromekelleher]

Shall we merge?

[szhan]

Wait, I'm adding some more results.

[szhan]

Yep ready for merging.

[szhan]

Note that in the RecombinHunt results, when the left Pango parent is "na", it means that the sequences for that Pango X was not in the dataset. Also, when the left Pango parent is indicated but the right Pango parent is "na", it means that RecombinHunt identified the Pango as a non-recombinant.

[szhan]

Ah!!! I forgot to sort by Pango X label.

[szhan]

Actually, hold on. I might as well add the CovRecomb results too.

[szhan]

Okay, not including the CovRecomb results for now, because it seems like a pain. There should be enough to do a first-pass analysis. Ready for merging @jeromekelleher.