Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add discussion of incomplete types and constraints for Hagenberg meeting #513

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

jbcoe
Copy link
Owner

@jbcoe jbcoe commented Feb 4, 2025

No description provided.

@jbcoe jbcoe requested review from Twon and nbx8 as code owners February 4, 2025 19:31
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.59%. Comparing base (977ef11) to head (b45c021).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #513      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.55%   99.59%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files           7       11       +4     
  Lines         669      743      +74     
  Branches       75       75              
==========================================
+ Hits          666      740      +74     
  Misses          3        3              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jbcoe jbcoe marked this pull request as draft February 4, 2025 19:54
DRAFT.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
DRAFT.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
DRAFT.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
DRAFT.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
DRAFT.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
DRAFT.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
DRAFT.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
DRAFT.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
DRAFT.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@nbx8 nbx8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review comments and amend.

@jbcoe jbcoe marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2025 20:47
@jbcoe jbcoe requested a review from nbx8 February 7, 2025 20:55
@jbcoe jbcoe changed the title Add examples and presentation for Hagenberg LEWG meeting Add discussion of incomplete types and constraints for Hagenberg meeting Feb 7, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@nbx8 nbx8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@jbcoe jbcoe merged commit 53fd00e into main Feb 7, 2025
2 checks passed
@jbcoe jbcoe deleted the dev-jbcoe-hagenberg-presentation branch February 7, 2025 20:57

```c++
struct Number {}; // Complete type.
Whilst appealing, this approach works badly in composition with other types.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I find 'works badly' uncompelling without the context, perhaps 'encounters problems'.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about:

Whilst appealing, this approach is problematic when used in composition with other types.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants