Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Reputation Oracle] fix: json-stable-stringify usage #3097

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

dnechay
Copy link
Contributor

@dnechay dnechay commented Feb 14, 2025

Issue tracking

N/A

Context behind the change

Deployment of RepO is failing because stringify result can be undefined and this type is not expected where used.
It started to happen after recent deps update where json-stable-stringify got bumped and newest version of the package has its own TypeScript definitions that are different from what was used before.

How has this been tested?

  • run yarn build for RepO

Release plan

Just merge

Potential risks; What to monitor; Rollback plan

No

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 14, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
human-app ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 14, 2025 2:50pm
human-dashboard-frontend ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 14, 2025 2:50pm
staking-dashboard ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 14, 2025 2:50pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
faucet-frontend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 14, 2025 2:50pm
faucet-server ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 14, 2025 2:50pm

@dnechay dnechay merged commit 9dc20ff into develop Feb 14, 2025
14 checks passed
@dnechay dnechay deleted the dnechay/fix-stringify-usages branch February 14, 2025 15:04
@dnechay dnechay mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2025
16 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants