[RLOO] fix token_level_kl

docs/source/rloo_trainer.md

@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ The [Reinforce++](https://hijkzzz.notion.site/reinforce-plus-plus) report by Jia
 - Clipping rewards: limiting reward values within a specific range to mitigate the impact of extreme rewards on model updates, thus preventing gradient explosion
 - Normalizing rewards: scaling rewards to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1, which helps in stabilizing the training process
 - Normalizing advantages: scaling advantages to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1, which helps in stabilizing the training process
-- Using token-level KL penalty (default) vs. sequence-level KL penalty
+- Using token-level KL penalty that is defined as equation (1) of the report vs. sequence-level KL penalty (default)
 
 These options are available via the appropriate arguments in the [`RLOOConfig`] class.
 

tests/test_rloo_trainer.py

@@ -61,15 +61,66 @@ def test_rloo_checkpoint(self):
     def test_rloo_reward(self):
         local_batch_size = 3
         rloo_k = 4
+        sequence_length = 5  # Add sequence length for testing token-level rewards
+
         # fmt: off
         rlhf_reward = torch.tensor([
             1, 2, 3, # first rlhf reward for three prompts
             2, 3, 4, # second rlhf reward for three prompts
             5, 6, 7, # third rlhf reward for three prompts
             8, 9, 10, # fourth rlhf reward for three prompts
         ]).float()
+
+        # Create padding mask where 1 indicates valid token, 0 indicates padding
+        padding_mask = torch.ones(local_batch_size * rloo_k, sequence_length)
+        # Set padding based on sequence lengths
+        sequence_lengths = torch.tensor([
+            3, 4, 3,  # lengths for first batch
+            4, 3, 4,  # lengths for second batch
+            3, 4, 3,  # lengths for third batch
+            4, 3, 4,  # lengths for fourth batch
+        ])
+        for i, length in enumerate(sequence_lengths):
+            padding_mask[i, length:] = 0
+
+        # Add kl tensor for testing token-level rewards
+        kl = torch.ones(local_batch_size * rloo_k, sequence_length)  # Dummy KL values
         # fmt: on
 
+        # Test token-level KL rewards following OpenRLHF implementation
+        kl_coef = 0.1
+        kl_reward = -kl_coef * kl
+
+        # Find last non-padded position
+        eos_indices = padding_mask.size(1) - 1 - padding_mask.long().fliplr().argmax(dim=1, keepdim=True)
+
+        # Create last reward tensor
+        last_reward = torch.zeros_like(kl)
+        last_reward.scatter_(dim=1, index=eos_indices, src=rlhf_reward.reshape(-1, 1))
+
+        # Test last_reward - should have rlhf_reward at the last non-padded position
+        for i, (length, reward) in enumerate(zip(sequence_lengths, rlhf_reward)):
+            # Check reward is at correct position
+            self.assertEqual(last_reward[i, length - 1].item(), reward.item())
+            # Check zeros elsewhere
+            self.assertTrue(torch.all(last_reward[i, : length - 1] == 0))
+            self.assertTrue(torch.all(last_reward[i, length:] == 0))
+
+        # Combine rewards
+        reward = last_reward + kl_reward
+        non_score_reward = kl_reward.sum(1)
+        token_level_rlhf_reward = reward.sum(1)
+
+        # Test reward components
+        # KL reward should be -0.1 for each token in sequence length
+        expected_kl_reward = -0.1 * sequence_length  # Each position gets -0.1 KL reward
+        torch.testing.assert_close(non_score_reward, torch.tensor(expected_kl_reward).expand_as(non_score_reward))
+
+        # Total reward should be rlhf_reward + kl_reward
+        expected_total = rlhf_reward + expected_kl_reward
+        torch.testing.assert_close(token_level_rlhf_reward, expected_total)
+
+        # Test sequence-level rewards (existing test)
         baseline = (rlhf_reward.sum(0) - rlhf_reward) / (rloo_k - 1)
         advantages = torch.zeros_like(rlhf_reward)
         for i in range(0, len(advantages), local_batch_size):
@@ -83,8 +134,41 @@ def test_rloo_reward(self):
         self.assertLess((1 - (2 + 5 + 8) / 3 - advantages[0].item()), 1e-6)
         self.assertLess((6 - (3 + 2 + 9) / 3 - advantages[7].item()), 1e-6)
 
-        # vectorized impl
+        # Test vectorized implementation
         rlhf_reward = rlhf_reward.reshape(rloo_k, local_batch_size)
         baseline = (rlhf_reward.sum(0) - rlhf_reward) / (rloo_k - 1)
         vec_advantages = rlhf_reward - baseline
         torch.testing.assert_close(vec_advantages.flatten(), advantages)
+
+    def test_rloo_training(self):
+        with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp_dir:
+            training_args = RLOOConfig(
+                output_dir=tmp_dir,
+                per_device_train_batch_size=2,
+                per_device_eval_batch_size=2,
+                total_episodes=1,
+                num_train_epochs=1,
+                max_steps=2,
+                report_to="none",
+            )
+
+            # Create a simple dataset
+            dummy_text = [{"content": "Hello World!", "role": "user"}]
+            dummy_data = self.tokenizer.apply_chat_template(dummy_text)
+            dummy_dataset = Dataset.from_dict({"input_ids": [dummy_data, dummy_data]})
+
+            trainer = RLOOTrainer(
+                config=training_args,
+                policy=self.policy_model,
+                reward_model=self.reward_model,
+                ref_policy=self.policy_ref_model,
+                processing_class=self.tokenizer,
+                train_dataset=dummy_dataset,
+                eval_dataset=dummy_dataset,
+            )
+
+            # Test that training completes without errors
+            trainer.train()
+
+            # Check if objective/rlhf_reward is available
+            self.assertIn("objective/rlhf_reward", trainer.state.log_history[-1])

trl/trainer/rloo_config.py

@@ -93,6 +93,6 @@ class RLOOConfig(OnPolicyConfig):
         metadata={"help": "Whether to normalize advantages"},
     )
     token_level_kl: bool = field(
-        default=True,
+        default=False,
         metadata={"help": "Whether to use token-level KL penalty or sequence-level KL penalty"},
     )

trl/trainer/rloo_trainer.py

@@ -397,13 +397,24 @@ def repeat_generator():
                 # Compute total reward with KL penalty
                 if args.token_level_kl:
                     # Token-level KL penalty: apply KL penalty per token
-                    token_kl_penalty = -args.kl_coef * kl
-                    non_score_reward = token_kl_penalty.sum(1)
+                    kl_reward = -args.kl_coef * kl
+
+                    # Get the index of the last non-padded token for each sequence
+                    eos_indices = padding_mask.size(1) - 1 - padding_mask.long().fliplr().argmax(dim=1, keepdim=True)
+                    last_reward = torch.zeros_like(kl)
+                    # Ensure scores has correct shape and type
+                    scores_shaped = scores.reshape(-1, 1).to(kl.dtype)
+                    last_reward.scatter_(dim=1, index=eos_indices, src=scores_shaped)
+
+                    # Combine KL reward and last reward
+                    non_score_reward = kl_reward.sum(1)  # Keep this for logging
+                    reward = last_reward + kl_reward
+                    rlhf_reward = reward.sum(1)  # Sum across sequence length
                 else:
                     # Sequence-level KL penalty: sum KL across tokens first
                     sequence_kl = kl.sum(1)
                     non_score_reward = -args.kl_coef * sequence_kl
-                rlhf_reward = scores + non_score_reward
+                    rlhf_reward = non_score_reward + scores
 
                 # vectorized RLOO advantages implementation
                 rlhf_reward = rlhf_reward.reshape(args.rloo_k, -1)