Replace tokenizer to processing_class in Seq2SeqTrainer #35452
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
LysandreJik
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Awesome, thank you! cc @qubvel as I believe you originally implemented self.processing_class
|
The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. |
5 tasks
|
Hi @qubvel ! Can you please check if it is okay to merge this PR?? |
|
Hi @zzaebok! Thanks for updating it 👍 |
AlanPonnachan
pushed a commit
to AlanPonnachan/transformers
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
This PR replace
tokenizerusage inSeq2SeqTrainertoprocessing_classto prevent from showing warning "Trainer.tokenizer is now deprecated. You should use Trainer.processing_class instead."Fixes # (issue)
#35446
Before submitting
Pull Request section?
to it if that's the case.
documentation guidelines, and
here are tips on formatting docstrings.
Who can review?
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.
@LysandreJik