Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement new MLscript syntax #120

Closed
LPTK opened this issue Jul 16, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #187
Closed

Implement new MLscript syntax #120

LPTK opened this issue Jul 16, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #187
Labels

Comments

@LPTK
Copy link
Contributor

LPTK commented Jul 16, 2022

This is a tracking issue for the current effort to reimplement the parser, and with it change and extend the syntax of MLscript to make it more practical and expressive.

Among other things, the new syntax will allow nested classes, and class definitions will be allowed to take value parameters. The unnesting of classes for efficient compilation is briefly discussed here: 82d89e0#commitcomment-78640652.

@LPTK LPTK moved this to 🏗 In progress in MLscript backlog Aug 31, 2022
@LPTK LPTK added parser enhancement New feature or request and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Aug 31, 2022
@LPTK LPTK moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in MLscript backlog Dec 21, 2022
@LPTK LPTK linked a pull request Oct 11, 2023 that will close this issue
@LPTK LPTK closed this as completed in #187 Jan 12, 2024
@LPTK LPTK moved this from 👀 In review to ✅ Done in MLscript backlog Feb 15, 2024
@LPTK LPTK moved this from ✅ Done to 👀 In review in MLscript backlog Feb 15, 2024
@LPTK LPTK moved this from 👀 In review to ✅ Done in MLscript backlog Feb 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant