Update eslint npm packages

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
eslint (source)	devDependencies	minor	9.20.1 -> 9.21.0
eslint (source)	dependencies	minor	9.20.1 -> 9.21.0
eslint-config-prettier	dependencies	patch	10.0.1 -> 10.0.2
eslint-import-resolver-typescript	dependencies	patch	3.8.1 -> 3.8.3
eslint-plugin-react-hooks (source)	dependencies	minor	5.1.0 -> 5.2.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.21.0

Compare Source

Features

• 418717f feat: introduce new deprecated types for rules (#​19238) (fnx)
• 5c5b802 feat: Add --ext CLI option (#​19405) (Milos Djermanovic)

Bug Fixes

• db5340d fix: update missing plugin message template (#​19445) (Milos Djermanovic)
• d8ffdd4 fix: do not exit process on rule crash (#​19436) (Francesco Trotta)

Documentation

• c5561ea docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
• 80b0485 docs: replace var with let and const in rule example (#​19434) (Tanuj Kanti)
• f67d5e8 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
• 75afc61 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
• 0636cab docs: Update Eleventy from v2 to v3 (#​19415) (Amaresh S M)
• dd7d930 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)

Chores

• a8c9a9f chore: update @eslint/eslintrc and @eslint/js (#​19453) (Francesco Trotta)
• 265e0cf chore: package.json update for @​eslint/js release (Jenkins)
• 3401b85 test: add test for Rule.ReportDescriptor type (#​19449) (Francesco Trotta)
• e497aa7 chore: update rewrite dependencies (#​19448) (Francesco Trotta)
• dab5478 chore: better error message for missing plugin in config (#​19402) (Tanuj Kanti)
• ebfe2eb chore: set js language for bug report issue config block (#​19439) (Josh Goldberg ✨)
• 5fd211d test: processors can return subpaths (#​19425) (Milos Djermanovic)

prettier/eslint-config-prettier (eslint-config-prettier)

v10.0.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• #​299 e750edc Thanks @​Fdawgs! - chore(package): explicitly declare js module type

import-js/eslint-import-resolver-typescript (eslint-import-resolver-typescript)

v3.8.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• #​360 8192976 Thanks @​carlocorradini! - Force tiniglobby to expand dot directories

• #​360 8192976 Thanks @​carlocorradini! - Update tinyglobby to latest version

v3.8.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• #​357 5fd349e Thanks @​carlocorradini! - Update the tinyglobby to the latest version to solve performance regressions.

facebook/react (eslint-plugin-react-hooks)

v5.2.0

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 20.78%. Comparing base (e1ab8df) to head (5c06e74).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6493   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   20.78%   20.78%           
=======================================
  Files         557      557           
  Lines       19399    19399           
  Branches     2952     2952           
=======================================
  Hits         4033     4033           
  Misses      15309    15309           
  Partials       57       57           

Flag	Coverage Δ
blockprotocol.type-system	37.50% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.93% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.036 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 210 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.487 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.613 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.956 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-30.063 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.367 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 199 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.968 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.02 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$2.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.515 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.420 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}22.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.08 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.681 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.24 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}45.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.723 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.87 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.519 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.081 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.55 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.654 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$54.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$43.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$56.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.481 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$66.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.302 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$48.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.964 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$87.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 384 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 169 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.572 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$73.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.864 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$90.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 436 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.286 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$99.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 418 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.672 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$83.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 648 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.828 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$57.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.178 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.37 \mathrm{s} \pm 533 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.931 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$181 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.27 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.441 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.021 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph