Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_kubernetes_fleet_manager - Add support for hub_profile property #28365

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhq
Copy link
Contributor

@hqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhq hqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhq commented Dec 22, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

azurerm_kubernetes_fleet_manager - Add support for hub_profile property
The current api version 2024-04-01 now supports the hub_profile property.
This resource is originally auto generated by pandora, but the generated code for api version 2024-04-01 does not work and needs to be implemented manually.

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)
image

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_kubernetes_fleet_manager - Add support for hub_profile property

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

})
}

func TestAccKubernetesFleetManager_update(t *testing.T) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please keep this test case to verify if the tags can be updated. You can create a update function to provide the config with updated tags.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added
image

@hqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhq hqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhq marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 02:05
@hqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhq hqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhq requested a review from a team as a code owner January 7, 2025 02:05
Comment on lines +110 to 116
var model KubernetesFleetManagerModel
if err := metadata.Decode(&model); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("decoding: %+v", err)
}

client := metadata.Client.ContainerService.V20231015.Fleets
subscriptionId := metadata.Client.Account.SubscriptionId
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please be mindful of the ordering of calls here, boilerplate code should follow the same pattern and ordering as the rest of the provider.

Suggested change
var model KubernetesFleetManagerModel
if err := metadata.Decode(&model); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("decoding: %+v", err)
}
client := metadata.Client.ContainerService.V20231015.Fleets
subscriptionId := metadata.Client.Account.SubscriptionId
client := metadata.Client.ContainerService.V20231015.Fleets
subscriptionId := metadata.Client.Account.SubscriptionId
var model KubernetesFleetManagerModel
if err := metadata.Decode(&model); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("decoding: %+v", err)
}

if !response.WasNotFound(existing.HttpResponse) {
return metadata.ResourceRequiresImport(r.ResourceType(), id)
}

var payload fleets.Fleet
r.mapKubernetesFleetManagerResourceSchemaToFleet(config, &payload)
fleetResource := &fleets.Fleet{
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is usually called params or payload

output.Tags = tags.Flatten(input.Tags)
func flattenFleetHubProfileModel(input *fleets.FleetHubProfile) []FleetHubProfileModel {
if input == nil {
return nil
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should return an empty hub profile model here

Suggested change
return nil
return []FleetHubProfileModel

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants