-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[TestGru] Add unit test for app/routes/api.models.ts #16
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
… getProviderInfo in api.models.ts.
Review or Edit in CodeSandboxOpen the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders |
Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow. |
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Trigger Info
Summary
This PR introduces unit tests for the
getProviderInfo
function inapi.models.ts
using Vitest. The key changes include:New Test File: Added
api.models.test.ts
to test the functionality ofgetProviderInfo
.Mocking: Mocked the
LLMManager
module to simulate provider data.Test Cases: Verified that:
Cached providers and default provider are returned correctly.
Subsequent calls use cached values, reducing redundant calls to
LLMManager
methods.Exports: Exported
cachedProviders
,cachedDefaultProvider
, andgetProviderInfo
fromapi.models.ts
for testing purposes.Coverage
The change in coverage value, such as:
0% -> 50%
, indicates that the coverage was 0% before writing the tests and 50% after writing them.https://web.dev/articles/ta-code-coverage
Test Statuses
Tip
You can
@gru-agent
and leave your feedback. TestGru will make adjustments based on your inputTip
You can
@gru-agent rebase
to rebase the PR.Tip
You can
@gru-agent redo
to reset or rebase before redoing the PR.Tip
To modify the test code yourself, click here Edit Test Code