Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve tool UI and support nested thoughts #10226

Draft
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

hannahblair
Copy link
Collaborator

@hannahblair hannahblair commented Dec 19, 2024

Description

Please include a concise summary, in clear English, of the changes in this pull request. If it closes an issue, please mention it here.

Screenshot 2025-01-06 at 19 31 26

Closes: #(issue)

🎯 PRs Should Target Issues

Before your create a PR, please check to see if there is an existing issue for this change. If not, please create an issue before you create this PR, unless the fix is very small.

Not adhering to this guideline will result in the PR being closed.

Testing and Formatting Your Code

  1. PRs will only be merged if tests pass on CI. We recommend at least running the backend tests locally, please set up your Gradio environment locally and run the backed tests: bash scripts/run_backend_tests.sh

  2. Please run these bash scripts to automatically format your code: bash scripts/format_backend.sh, and (if you made any changes to non-Python files) bash scripts/format_frontend.sh

@gradio-pr-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

gradio-pr-bot commented Dec 19, 2024

🪼 branch checks and previews

Name Status URL
Spaces ready! Spaces preview
Website ready! Website preview
Storybook ready! Storybook preview
🦄 Changes detecting...

Install Gradio from this PR

pip install https://gradio-pypi-previews.s3.amazonaws.com/56fcac2cfca44b2f9f556cd676aaa1f4358162c9/gradio-5.9.1-py3-none-any.whl

Install Gradio Python Client from this PR

pip install "gradio-client @ git+https://github.com/gradio-app/gradio@56fcac2cfca44b2f9f556cd676aaa1f4358162c9#subdirectory=client/python"

Install Gradio JS Client from this PR

npm install https://gradio-npm-previews.s3.amazonaws.com/56fcac2cfca44b2f9f556cd676aaa1f4358162c9/gradio-client-1.8.0.tgz

Use Lite from this PR

<script type="module" src="https://gradio-lite-previews.s3.amazonaws.com/56fcac2cfca44b2f9f556cd676aaa1f4358162c9/dist/lite.js""></script>

@gradio-pr-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

gradio-pr-bot commented Dec 19, 2024

🦄 change detected

This Pull Request includes changes to the following packages.

Package Version
@gradio/chatbot minor
gradio minor
  • Maintainers can select this checkbox to manually select packages to update.

With the following changelog entry.

Improve tool UI and support nested thoughts

Maintainers or the PR author can modify the PR title to modify this entry.

Something isn't right?

  • Maintainers can change the version label to modify the version bump.
  • If the bot has failed to detect any changes, or if this pull request needs to update multiple packages to different versions or requires a more comprehensive changelog entry, maintainers can update the changelog file directly.

@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@

class MetadataDict(TypedDict):
title: Union[str, None]
id: NotRequired[int]
parent_id: NotRequired[int]
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is just so i could test in a demo, i'll remove this later

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why remove this, we'll need to keep it so that developers can control which thoughts are nested inside which other ones, right?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah true, didnt know if this should be done outside of this pr though!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's do it as part of this pr I think so we can test things end-to-end

@@ -206,7 +207,7 @@
</div>
</div>

{#if layout === "bubble"}
{#if layout === "bubble" && should_show_buttons}
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't show buttons for thoughts

/* Colors */
.bubble .bot {
border-color: var(--border-color-primary);
}
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wasnt used/needed

@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
<script lang="ts">
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

renamed MessageBox.svelte to Thought.svelte

@abidlabs
Copy link
Member

abidlabs commented Jan 6, 2025

Design looks great! As mentioned internally, I think it would be better if we are able to find a way to display tools without removing the border around chat messages

@abidlabs
Copy link
Member

abidlabs commented Jan 6, 2025

What do you think about automatically getting and displaying the time it took for the thought to complete as part of the thought heading?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants