Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow reading
json_name
field option for proto serialization #2701Allow reading
json_name
field option for proto serialization #2701Changes from 5 commits
cae0d97
4907723
5c555a6
6ccba7d
5515f36
07918d6
c7f37dd
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here I think you could write
{@link FieldDescriptor#getOptions}
and{@link FieldDescriptor#getJsonName}
since we do importFieldDescriptor
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this sentence about
getOptions
andgetJsonName
actually relevant for users of this adapter, or is this an implementation detail and we should omit it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i meant it as a way to explain why users of the adapter expect to see this method here instead of just using the
addSerializedNameExtension
which might be their initial intuition. i'm cool with removing it if you think it doesn't help.