Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: clean up workflows #3429

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025
Merged

chore: clean up workflows #3429

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

arjunaj5
Copy link
Contributor

@arjunaj5 arjunaj5 commented Jan 20, 2025

Clickup

https://app.clickup.com

Code Coverage

Please add code coverage here

UI Preview

Please add screenshots for UI changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Workflow Updates
    • Modified GitHub Actions workflows to remove "edited" event triggers for linting and unit tests
    • Removed "AI Code Reviewer" workflow
    • Removed "Pull Request Stats" daily reporting workflow

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Walkthrough

In a swift, stylish move, the GitHub Actions workflows have been streamlined! The linting, unit tests, and AI code review workflows have been modified to remove the "edited" event trigger. The stats.yml workflow has been completely removed, eliminating daily pull request statistics reporting. These changes simplify the CI/CD pipeline, reducing unnecessary workflow executions while maintaining core functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/lint.yml Removed edited event type from pull request trigger
.github/workflows/main.yml Deleted entire "AI Code Reviewer" workflow
.github/workflows/stats.yml Deleted entire "Pull Request Stats" workflow
.github/workflows/unit-tests.yml Removed edited event type from pull request trigger

Suggested Labels

size/XS

Suggested Reviewers

  • suyashpatil78
  • Chethan-Fyle

Poem

Workflows dance, triggers trim,
CI/CD's rhythm, sleek and slim!
Rajini-style code review's might,
Streamlined actions, burning bright! 🚀
Efficiency strikes like lightning's gleam! ⚡


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64e8104 and fbfb1ee.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/main.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/stats.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/unit-tests.yml (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/stats.yml
  • .github/workflows/main.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build (12.x)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)

7-7: Mind it! This change is perfectly balanced, like my signature sunglasses! 🕶️

Removing the 'edited' trigger is a stylish move, macha! When someone just edits the PR title or description, why waste time running lints? Let the lints run only when they matter - when PRs are opened or new code is pushed. That's the Thalaivar way of optimization!

.github/workflows/unit-tests.yml (2)

7-7: Kabali style optimization! 😎

Just like in lint.yml, removing the 'edited' trigger here is pure wisdom. When you make a style like this in two files, it's not a coincidence - it's a statement!


Line range hint 35-44: These coverage thresholds are as uncompromising as my principles! 💪

Mind it! These coverage requirements are no joke:

  • Lines & Statements: 95% (as solid as my punch dialogues!)
  • Branches: 91.10% (precise to two decimals, just like my timing!)
  • Functions: 94% (strict like my discipline!)

This is how you maintain quality, with style! Keep these high standards, they're not just numbers - they're a commitment to excellence!


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S Small PR label Jan 20, 2025
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ on:
push:
branches: [ master ]
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize, edited]
types: [opened, synchronize]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lint need not run on modification of pull request description or title

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ on:
push:
branches: [master]
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize, edited]
types: [opened, synchronize]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unit tests need not run on modification of pull request description or title

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ on:
push:
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

above 2 removed workflows are unused

@arjunaj5 arjunaj5 requested a review from bistaastha January 20, 2025 07:43
Copy link

Unit Test Coverage % values
Statements 95.91% ( 19297 / 20119 )
Branches 91.1% ( 10656 / 11696 )
Functions 94.14% ( 5738 / 6095 )
Lines 95.96% ( 18423 / 19197 )

@arjunaj5 arjunaj5 merged commit 6fc77f6 into master Jan 21, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/S Small PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants