cmd/clef: fix JS issues in rules.md

[savvar9991]

1. Fixed punctuation in header:

-The two main features that are required for this to work well are;
+The two main features that are required for this to work well are:

Explanation: Replaced semicolon with colon since it introduces a list of items.

2. Updated BigNumber constructor usage

-var limit = big.NewInt("0xb1a2bc2ec50000")
+var limit = new BigNumber("0xb1a2bc2ec50000")

Explanation: The code was using an incorrect method big.NewInt() which doesn't exist in the BigNumber.js library. The correct way to create a BigNumber instance is using the new BigNumber() constructor. This is particularly important when dealing with large numbers in Ethereum transactions where precision is crucial. The value "0xb1a2bc2ec50000" represents a hexadecimal number that needs to be handled as a big number to avoid JavaScript's number precision limitations.

3. Fixed condition syntax:

-if (req.transaction.to.toLowerCase() == "0xae967917c465db8578ca9024c205720b1a3651a9") && value.lt(limit)) {
+if (req.transaction.to.toLowerCase() == "0xae967917c465db8578ca9024c205720b1a3651a9" && value.lt(limit)) {

Explanation: The original code had an extra parenthesis that created incorrect grouping in the logical expression. In JavaScript, this could lead to unexpected behavior or syntax errors. The condition checks two things: first, if the lowercase transaction address matches a specific address, and second, if the value is less than the limit using BigNumber's lt() (less than) method. The fixed version properly groups these conditions with the logical AND (&&) operator.

[s1na]

Lol is this copilot generated description? The code change looks good to me. It's true big.NewInt is go syntax not JS.

[savvar9991]

Lol is this copilot generated description? The code change looks good to me. It's true big.NewInt is go syntax not JS.

I'm sorry, I didn't notice

[s1na]

Lol is this copilot generated description? The code change looks good to me. It's true big.NewInt is go syntax not JS.

I'm sorry, I didn't notice

I think there was a misunderstanding. Your code changes are correct.