-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix (build): Fix configuration-path: .bazel-steward.yaml #1177
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @vorburger, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request addresses issue #254 and focuses on fixing the configuration path for Bazel Steward. The changes modify the .github/workflows/bazel-steward.yaml
file to update the permissions and explicitly set the configuration-path
to .bazel-steward.yaml
. This ensures that Bazel Steward correctly locates and uses the configuration file.
Highlights
- Permissions Update: The pull request updates the permissions in the workflow file from
write-all
tocontents: write
andpull-requests: write
, aligning with the necessary permissions for Bazel Steward. - Configuration Path: The pull request explicitly sets the
configuration-path
to.bazel-steward.yaml
in the Bazel Steward workflow, ensuring the tool finds the configuration file.
Changelog
- .github/workflows/bazel-steward.yaml
- Updated permissions from
write-all
tocontents: write
andpull-requests: write
(lines 23-24). - Added
configuration-path: .bazel-steward.yaml
to explicitly define the configuration file path (line 50). - Replaced a comment with a TODO referencing issue chore(deps): Bump MkDocs Include plugin from 5.0.0 to 6.0.4 #414 (line 47).
- Updated permissions from
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
The YAML file, a structured guide,
For workflows where automations reside.
With keys and values aligned with care,
Ensuring tasks execute without a scare.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request aims to fix the configuration path for Bazel Steward and adjust permissions in the workflow file. The changes seem reasonable, but there are a few points that need attention.
Summary of Findings
- Permissions configuration: The change from
write-all
to specificcontents
andpull-requests
permissions is a good security practice. However, ensure that these permissions are sufficient for Bazel Steward's operations. - TODO comments: The pull request introduces a new TODO comment. It's important to track these and address them in future iterations.
- Configuration path: The addition of
configuration-path: .bazel-steward.yaml
explicitly sets the configuration path. Verify that this path is correct and that the configuration file exists in the repository.
Merge Readiness
The pull request appears to be on the right track, but the TODO comment should be tracked and addressed in the future. The permissions change is a good security practice. I am unable to directly approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging. I recommend addressing the comments before merging.
contents: write | ||
pull-requests: write |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -45,7 +44,9 @@ jobs: | |||
fetch-depth: 0 | |||
- uses: VirtusLab/[email protected] | |||
# NB: Cannot use hash instead of version here due to | |||
# https://github.com/VirtusLab/bazel-steward/issues/414. | |||
# TODO https://github.com/VirtusLab/bazel-steward/issues/414. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Relates to #254.