Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix (build): Fix configuration-path: .bazel-steward.yaml #1177

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

vorburger
Copy link
Member

Relates to #254.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @vorburger, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request addresses issue #254 and focuses on fixing the configuration path for Bazel Steward. The changes modify the .github/workflows/bazel-steward.yaml file to update the permissions and explicitly set the configuration-path to .bazel-steward.yaml. This ensures that Bazel Steward correctly locates and uses the configuration file.

Highlights

  • Permissions Update: The pull request updates the permissions in the workflow file from write-all to contents: write and pull-requests: write, aligning with the necessary permissions for Bazel Steward.
  • Configuration Path: The pull request explicitly sets the configuration-path to .bazel-steward.yaml in the Bazel Steward workflow, ensuring the tool finds the configuration file.

Changelog

  • .github/workflows/bazel-steward.yaml
    • Updated permissions from write-all to contents: write and pull-requests: write (lines 23-24).
    • Added configuration-path: .bazel-steward.yaml to explicitly define the configuration file path (line 50).
    • Replaced a comment with a TODO referencing issue chore(deps): Bump MkDocs Include plugin from 5.0.0 to 6.0.4 #414 (line 47).
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


The YAML file, a structured guide,
For workflows where automations reside.
With keys and values aligned with care,
Ensuring tasks execute without a scare.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request aims to fix the configuration path for Bazel Steward and adjust permissions in the workflow file. The changes seem reasonable, but there are a few points that need attention.

Summary of Findings

  • Permissions configuration: The change from write-all to specific contents and pull-requests permissions is a good security practice. However, ensure that these permissions are sufficient for Bazel Steward's operations.
  • TODO comments: The pull request introduces a new TODO comment. It's important to track these and address them in future iterations.
  • Configuration path: The addition of configuration-path: .bazel-steward.yaml explicitly sets the configuration path. Verify that this path is correct and that the configuration file exists in the repository.

Merge Readiness

The pull request appears to be on the right track, but the TODO comment should be tracked and addressed in the future. The permissions change is a good security practice. I am unable to directly approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging. I recommend addressing the comments before merging.

Comment on lines +23 to +24
contents: write
pull-requests: write
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The change from write-all to specific permissions is a good security practice. However, ensure that contents: write and pull-requests: write are sufficient for Bazel Steward's operations. If Bazel Steward requires other permissions, they should be added explicitly.

@@ -45,7 +44,9 @@ jobs:
fetch-depth: 0
- uses: VirtusLab/[email protected]
# NB: Cannot use hash instead of version here due to
# https://github.com/VirtusLab/bazel-steward/issues/414.
# TODO https://github.com/VirtusLab/bazel-steward/issues/414.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This TODO comment should be tracked and addressed in a future issue or pull request. Consider creating a GitHub issue to track this.

@vorburger vorburger merged commit a433b81 into enola-dev:main Mar 4, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@vorburger vorburger deleted the bazel-steward8 branch March 4, 2025 02:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant