fix (build): Use version (tag) instead of SHA pin REV #1169
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @vorburger, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request addresses an issue with the bazel-steward workflow where using the SHA pin REV is causing problems, as described in issue #414 in the VirtusLab/bazel-steward repository. To resolve this, I've updated the bazel-steward workflow to use the version tag (v1.6.0) instead of the SHA pin. Additionally, I've renamed the CI workflow to 'Build, Test & Deploy (CI)' for clarity.
Highlights
- Dependency Pinning: Replaced SHA pin with version tag (v1.6.0) for bazel-steward action in
.github/workflows/bazel-steward.yamlto address issue chore(deps): Bump MkDocs Include plugin from 5.0.0 to 6.0.4 #414 in the VirtusLab/bazel-steward repository. - Workflow Naming: Renamed the CI workflow from 'CI' to 'Build, Test & Deploy (CI)' in
.github/workflows/ci.yamlto improve clarity.
Changelog
- .github/workflows/bazel-steward.yaml
- Replaced the SHA pin for the bazel-steward action with the version tag v1.6.0.
- Added a comment explaining why the version tag is used instead of the SHA pin, referencing issue chore(deps): Bump MkDocs Include plugin from 5.0.0 to 6.0.4 #414.
- .github/workflows/ci.yaml
- Renamed the workflow from 'CI' to 'Build, Test & Deploy (CI)'.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A workflow's plight, a version's call,
SHA pins falter, causing a fall.
With tags embraced, stability's found,
In code's domain, solutions abound.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request addresses issue #414 by switching from using the SHA pin to a version tag for bazel-steward in the GitHub Actions workflow. This change is necessary due to the identified issue. Additionally, the CI workflow name has been updated to be more descriptive.
Merge Readiness
The pull request appears to address the identified issue and includes a relevant comment explaining the change. The update to the CI workflow name is also a positive change. I am unable to directly approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging. Given the changes are relatively straightforward and address a known issue, the pull request seems ready to be merged.
Due to VirtusLab/bazel-steward#414.
Relates to #254.