-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[elastic/beats] [HttpJson] - Improves request chaining with new 'while' step & client creation per step #32222
Merged
Merged
Changes from 14 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c2c2435
initial commit
ShourieG adbc584
While block introduced in chain config, per step creation of httpcli…
ShourieG beb530f
removed debug code
ShourieG 4aa994b
added auth inheriting from parent
ShourieG e8b4340
updated docs
ShourieG 150d23e
made linter recommended fixes
ShourieG 171f822
made recommended changes as per PR suggetions
ShourieG bb4f03c
added tests
ShourieG 74df0cb
fixed errors for linting checks
ShourieG 5749b08
eliminated specifying nill values
ShourieG a0e7dd3
made till , a mandatory parameter for whileconfig
ShourieG cc182c9
Update x-pack/filebeat/input/httpjson/policy.go
ShourieG c939af5
Update x-pack/filebeat/docs/inputs/input-httpjson.asciidoc
ShourieG 8126488
updated docs , made PR fixes
ShourieG d2764a7
updated the docs as per suggetions
ShourieG File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR still adds a few "Please refer X" expressions. My understanding is that those are not correct, please correct me if I'm wrong.
I lean towards using "See X" instead of "Please refer to X for more information" as a replacement.
Also, this one uses a `literal` instead of a <<link>>, can it be turned into a link?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@adriansr updated the docs as per the suggestions. Please review once.