Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remove fieldmap type backward compatibility < dd4hep 1.26 #671

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2024

Conversation

wdconinc
Copy link
Contributor

Briefly, what does this PR introduce?

This PR removes the forward/backward compatibliity that we introduced for the transition from DD4hep 1.25 to 1.26. Since we now require DD4hep 1.27 for other reasons (HexGrid segmentation), we don't have any backward compatibility anymore.

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bug fix (issue #__)
  • New feature (issue #__)
  • Documentation update
  • Other: technical debt payment on principal

Please check if this PR fulfills the following:

  • Tests for the changes have been added
  • Documentation has been added / updated
  • Changes have been communicated to collaborators

Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code?

No.

Does this PR change default behavior?

No.

This removes the forward/backward compatibliity that we introduced for the transition from DD4hep 1.25 to 1.26. Since we now require DD4hep 1.27 for other reasons (HexGrid segmentation), we don't have any backward compatibility anymore.
@wdconinc wdconinc requested a review from veprbl March 18, 2024 13:19
@wdconinc wdconinc enabled auto-merge March 18, 2024 13:20
@wdconinc wdconinc added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 1477f39 Mar 19, 2024
86 checks passed
@wdconinc wdconinc deleted the fieldmap-type branch March 19, 2024 00:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants