IFSBench: Install via pyproject.toml, absolute import paths and internalised entry points

[mlange05]

This is a housekeeping PR that moves the installation meta information for pip to pyproject.toml, changes to a complete use of absolute imports throughout the package. With that in place, I've then also created a sub-package cli and moved the utilities, as well as the external entry point scripts into this internal sub-package. This then allows us to get rid of the __main__ dunder calls and explicit shebangs.

Integration note: Please check that the external-facing tools works as you'd expect and that the ifs-test CLI interfacing still works as one expects.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.09%. Comparing base (73ff5eb) to head (8e3b4fb).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #14      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.69%   76.09%   -2.60%     
==========================================
  Files          24       27       +3     
  Lines        1985     2121     +136     
==========================================
+ Hits         1562     1614      +52     
- Misses        423      507      +84     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[johannesbulin]

Looks good so far - I've run some additional checks:

• CMake based install
• Pip install with optional packages
• Use ifs-bench.py scripts.

I haven't checked ifs-test explicitly as this uses tagged versions of ifsbench (i.e. changes here shouldn't affect it) and other upcoming changes (#12 for example) will break ifs-test in any case.

No issues so far so I am happy to get this merged.

[reuterbal]

Very nice, thanks for taking care of this!

Just a little pointer on two packages that are no longer required - not strictly related to this PR but it's a good enough opportunity to take care of this maybe?

[reuterbal]

This was just required to convert pytest output to XML for Bamboo to understand. I suggest we remove this now.

[reuterbal]

Similarly, this was required because it was the best way to route the pylint output via pytest to Bamboo. We're running this separately now, so no longer required.

[reuterbal]

Thanks, all good from my side. We do have implicit coverage reduction because the CLI scripts are now counted against code coverage (but not tested).