docs: documentation about the status list credential mechanism #562
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
paullatzelsperger
added
the
documentation
paullatzelsperger
force-pushed
the
docs/statuslist-credentials
branch
2 times, most recently
from
266dafd to
2dfd94b
Compare
wolf4ood
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2025
docs/developer/architecture/issuer/credential-revocation/credential-revocation.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…ntial-revocation.md Co-authored-by: Enrico Risa <[email protected]>
paullatzelsperger
force-pushed
the
docs/statuslist-credentials
branch
from
01119ba to
0b1d257
Compare
jimmarino
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR changes/adds
documents the status list mechanism
Why it does that
does documentation really need justification?
Further notes
List other areas of code that have changed but are not necessarily linked to the main feature. This could be method
signature changes, package declarations, bugs that were encountered and were fixed inline, etc.
Who will sponsor this feature?
Please @-mention the committer that will sponsor your feature.
Linked Issue(s)
Closes # <-- insert Issue number if one exists
Please be sure to take a look at the contributing guidelines and our etiquette for pull requests.