Fix Documentation Inconsistency in Joke Class Example #356
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix Documentation Inconsistency in Joke Class Example
This pull request addresses an inconsistency found in the
Joke
class example within the README file of theoutlines
repository. The changes ensure that the inline documentation correctly reflects the actual output format.Changes Made
Joke
class definition to useField
descriptors forjoke
andexplanation
attributes.Issue Identified
The previous version of the README included an example where the
Joke
class did not useField
descriptors, leading to a discrepancy between the class definition and the output format described in the comments. This could potentially cause confusion for users trying to understand the expected behavior of thejoke_ppt
function.Resolution
By introducing
Field
descriptors in theJoke
class, the documentation now accurately reflects the structure and output format of thejoke_ppt
function, enhancing clarity and correctness.I believe these updates will make the documentation more accurate and helpful for users. Your feedback and further suggestions are always welcome.
Thank you for considering this pull request.