Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

External serialize/deserialize functions #190

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2025

Conversation

nadilas
Copy link
Member

@nadilas nadilas commented Jan 4, 2025

πŸ“¦ Published PR as canary version: Canary Versions

✨ Test out this PR locally via:

npm install @dotinc/[email protected]
npm install @dotinc/[email protected]
# or 
yarn add @dotinc/[email protected]
yarn add @dotinc/[email protected]

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced serialization and deserialization methods with optional custom functions
    • Added flexibility to convert objects to tree structures and vice versa by allowing custom serialization/deserialization strategies

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 4, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git β†—οΈŽ

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
ogre ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 4, 2025 5:37pm

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the serialization utility functions in the serialize.ts file. The changes introduce optional custom serialization and deserialization functions to the objectToTree and treeToObject methods. This enhancement allows developers to provide their own serialization and deserialization logic, replacing the default JSON.stringify and JSON.parse methods. The modifications provide more flexibility in handling object transformations while maintaining the original default behavior.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/ogre/src/serialize.ts - Updated objectToTree to accept optional serializeFn parameter
- Updated treeToObject to accept optional deserializeFn parameter
- Maintained default JSON serialization when no custom function provided

Poem

🐰 Serialization's Flexible Dance

With custom functions, we enhance
JSON's rigid, standard stance
A rabbit's code, now free to prance
Through objects with elegant grace! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Member Author

nadilas commented Jan 4, 2025

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/ogre/src/serialize.ts (1)

3-4: Ensure type coverage for serializeFn parameter.
While the current design is flexible, consider specifying a more precise type (e.g., a generic constraint) for obj to enhance type safety and help downstream consumers implement specialized serialization logic without relying on any.

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6f8bb8c and 56c1612.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/ogre/src/serialize.ts (1 hunks)
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (1)
packages/ogre/src/serialize.ts (1)

6-6: Validate compression settings.
The compression level and memory usage are explicitly set to { level: 6, mem: 8 }. Verify that these values are optimal for the intended dataset size and usage patterns, as over-compression can increase CPU overhead and memory usage.

Comment on lines +10 to +12
export const treeToObject = <T = any>(tree: string, deserializeFn?: (str: string) => T): T => {
const fn = deserializeFn ?? JSON.parse;
return fn(strFromU8(decompressSync(Buffer.from(tree, "base64"))));
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

πŸ› οΈ Refactor suggestion

Consider robust error handling for malformed input.
Currently, if tree is malformed or if deserializeFn expects a different format, the function may fail with runtime errors. Consider catching errors or validating the input before calling decompressSync or fn.

@nadilas nadilas merged commit d2181cf into main Jan 4, 2025
8 checks passed
@nadilas nadilas deleted the feat/external_serialize_deserialize_functions branch January 4, 2025 17:51
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 4, 2025

πŸš€ PR was released in @dotinc/[email protected], @dotinc/[email protected], @dotinc/[email protected] πŸš€

@github-actions github-actions bot added the released This issue/pull request has been released. label Jan 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
released This issue/pull request has been released.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant