[graphiql] fix types to allow overriding endpoint option

[EmrysMyrddin]

fixes #gw-117

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 5f4a468

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 24 packages

Name	Type
graphql-yoga	Minor
@graphql-yoga/nestjs	Major
@graphql-yoga/render-graphiql	Major
@graphql-yoga/plugin-apollo-inline-trace	Major
@graphql-yoga/apollo-managed-federation	Major
@graphql-yoga/plugin-apollo-usage-report	Major
@graphql-yoga/plugin-apq	Major
@graphql-yoga/plugin-csrf-prevention	Major
@graphql-yoga/plugin-defer-stream	Major
@graphql-yoga/plugin-disable-introspection	Major
@graphql-yoga/plugin-graphql-sse	Major
@graphql-yoga/plugin-jwt	Major
@graphql-yoga/plugin-persisted-operations	Major
@graphql-yoga/plugin-prometheus	Major
@graphql-yoga/plugin-response-cache	Major
@graphql-yoga/plugin-sofa	Major
apollo-federation-gateway-with-yoga	Patch
apollo-subgraph-with-yoga	Patch
graphql-lambda	Patch
cloudflare-advanced	Patch
cloudflare	Patch
nextjs-app	Patch
hello-world-benchmark	Patch
@graphql-yoga/nestjs-federation	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

Apollo Federation Subgraph Compatibility Results

Federation 1 Support	Federation 2 Support
_service 🟢 @key (single) 🟢 @key (multi) 🟢 @key (composite) 🟢 repeatable @key 🟢 @requires 🟢 @provides 🟢 federated tracing 🟢	@link 🟢 @shareable 🟢 @tag 🟢 @override 🟢 @inaccessible 🟢 @composeDirective 🟢 @interfaceObject 🟢

Learn more:

• Apollo Federation Subgraph Specification
• Compatibility Tests

[github-actions]

💻 Website Preview

The latest changes are available as preview in: https://99f68e46.graphql-yoga.pages.dev

[github-actions]

✅ Benchmark Results

     ✓ no_errors{mode:graphql}
     ✓ expected_result{mode:graphql}
     ✓ no_errors{mode:graphql-jit}
     ✓ expected_result{mode:graphql-jit}
     ✓ no_errors{mode:graphql-response-cache}
     ✓ expected_result{mode:graphql-response-cache}
     ✓ no_errors{mode:graphql-no-parse-validate-cache}
     ✓ expected_result{mode:graphql-no-parse-validate-cache}
     ✓ no_errors{mode:uws}
     ✓ expected_result{mode:uws}

     checks.......................................: 100.00% ✓ 507526      ✗ 0     
     data_received................................: 2.1 GB  14 MB/s
     data_sent....................................: 102 MB  680 kB/s
     http_req_blocked.............................: avg=1.59µs   min=1µs      med=1.37µs   max=2.55ms  p(90)=2.09µs   p(95)=2.3µs   
     http_req_connecting..........................: avg=11ns     min=0s       med=0s       max=2.46ms  p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_duration............................: avg=367.43µs min=212.69µs med=334.84µs max=19.02ms p(90)=484.78µs p(95)=514.09µs
       { expected_response:true }.................: avg=367.43µs min=212.69µs med=334.84µs max=19.02ms p(90)=484.78µs p(95)=514.09µs
     ✓ { mode:graphql-jit }.......................: avg=286.98µs min=212.69µs med=270.73µs max=19.02ms p(90)=301.2µs  p(95)=313.01µs
     ✓ { mode:graphql-no-parse-validate-cache }...: avg=515.6µs  min=414.49µs med=488.32µs max=6.48ms  p(90)=549.02µs p(95)=605.93µs
     ✓ { mode:graphql-response-cache }............: avg=346.49µs min=263.96µs med=328.95µs max=7.01ms  p(90)=360.68µs p(95)=372.48µs
     ✓ { mode:graphql }...........................: avg=375.23µs min=280.56µs med=348.06µs max=14.62ms p(90)=397.69µs p(95)=437.48µs
     ✓ { mode:uws }...............................: avg=357.43µs min=275.3µs  med=338.8µs  max=7.06ms  p(90)=378.73µs p(95)=403.71µs
     http_req_failed..............................: 0.00%   ✓ 0           ✗ 253763
     http_req_receiving...........................: avg=33.27µs  min=17.47µs  med=32.8µs   max=3.1ms   p(90)=39.66µs  p(95)=42.61µs 
     http_req_sending.............................: avg=8.67µs   min=5.84µs   med=7.56µs   max=1.05ms  p(90)=11.14µs  p(95)=12.37µs 
     http_req_tls_handshaking.....................: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s      p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_waiting.............................: avg=325.48µs min=182.21µs med=293.96µs max=18.86ms p(90)=442.17µs p(95)=469.89µs
     http_reqs....................................: 253763  1691.733369/s
     iteration_duration...........................: avg=586.12µs min=392.45µs med=548.56µs max=19.63ms p(90)=708.08µs p(95)=743.26µs
     iterations...................................: 253763  1691.733369/s
     vus..........................................: 1       min=1         max=1   
     vus_max......................................: 2       min=2         max=2   

[ardatan]

Should we have some tests to confirm the use case is working?

[EmrysMyrddin]

@ardatan It's not that easy to test it. And it was already working, it's more a fix in the types that was nor reflecting the underlying implementation.

[ardatan]

I added some tests. @EmrysMyrddin Could you check then we're good imo.

[EmrysMyrddin]

Perfect ! I was not aware we already had an e2e test with browser setup to test graphiql. That's pretty cool !
Thank you :-)