-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cheqd migration #310
cheqd migration #310
Conversation
await createNewWallet(); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it('should verify a non ZKP cheqd credential', async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we need one for ZKP too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, would be good to add one here. I was planning to add zkp with accumulators, but makes sense to have zkp without accumulators too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are facing few issues with zkp verification, I will push that test as separate PR probably along with accumulators tests
… feat/cheqd-migration
No description provided.