Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Changing the Triggers CRD TEP Status to Implementable
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Change the Status of 0009 Triggers CRD TEP Status to implementable
and added open questions
  • Loading branch information
khrm authored and tekton-robot committed Sep 9, 2020
1 parent c67dc0c commit 72cd0df
Showing 1 changed file with 27 additions and 22 deletions.
49 changes: 27 additions & 22 deletions teps/0009-trigger-crd.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,33 +3,33 @@ title: trigger-crd
authors:
- "@kbaig"
creation-date: 2020-07-14
last-updated: 2020-08-18
status: proposed
last-updated: 2020-09-08
status: implementable
---
# TEP-0009: Introducing TriggerCRD


<!-- toc -->
- [TEP-0009: Introducing TriggerCRD](#tep-0009-introducing-triggercrd)
- [Summary](#summary)
- [Motivation](#motivation)
- [Goals](#goals)
- [Non-Goals](#non-goals)
- [Requirements](#requirements)
- [Proposal](#proposal)
- [Trigger CRD](#trigger-crd)
- [Trigger Status](#trigger-status)
- [EventListener CRD](#eventlistener-crd)
- [Path based EventListener](#path-based-eventlistener)
- [User Stories](#user-stories)
- [End User handling Webhook Use Cases using TriggerCR](#end-user-handling-webhook-use-cases-using-triggercr)
- [Operator or Admin managing EventListener](#operator-or-admin-managing-eventlistener)
- [Risks and Mitigations](#risks-and-mitigations)
- [User Experience](#user-experience)
- [Performance](#performance)
- [Design Details](#design-details)
- [Alternatives](#alternatives)
- [Upgrade & Migration Strategy](#upgrade--migration-strategy)
- [Summary](#summary)
- [Motivation](#motivation)
- [Goals](#goals)
- [Non-Goals](#non-goals)
- [Requirements](#requirements)
- [Proposal](#proposal)
- [Trigger CRD](#trigger-crd)
- [Trigger Status](#trigger-status)
- [EventListener CRD](#eventlistener-crd)
- [Path based EventListener](#path-based-eventlistener)
- [User Stories](#user-stories)
- [End User handling Webhook Use Cases using TriggerCR](#end-user-handling-webhook-use-cases-using-triggercr)
- [Operator or Admin managing EventListener](#operator-or-admin-managing-eventlistener)
- [Risks and Mitigations](#risks-and-mitigations)
- [User Experience](#user-experience)
- [Performance](#performance)
- [Design Details](#design-details)
- [Alternatives](#alternatives)
- [Upgrade &amp; Migration Strategy](#upgrade--migration-strategy)
- [Open Questions](#open-questions)
<!-- /toc -->

## Summary
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -267,3 +267,8 @@ existing definition in EventListener Spec. Later on definition will be deprecate
2. Selector based EventListener will be implemented next. It will introduced along with existing implemention.
3. Path based EventListener will be implemented along with existing implemention.
4. Deprecating triggers section in EventListener.

## Open Questions
1. What kind of selectors do we need i.e do we need both `namespaceSelecor` and `triggerSelector`?
2. What should the path for path based EventListener look like? Should they handle multiple triggers?
3. Can multiple EventListeners point to the same Trigger?

0 comments on commit 72cd0df

Please sign in to comment.