Another coderabbit test (don't merge) #35728
Conversation
|
@CodeRabbit Please review |
|
@Charl1996 I've reviewed the changes in the PR. While I understand this is a test PR marked as "don't merge", I should point out that removing the 🔗 Analysis chain🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 1508 ✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Charl1996 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis change updates the email validation feedback functionality in the user registration script. A new class, Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User as User
participant JS as JS Function (setResetEmailFeedbackFn)
participant DOM as Email Feedback Element
User->>JS: Initiate email validation
JS->>DOM: Add "fa-spinner fa-spin disable-on-submit"
Note over DOM: Email validation in progress
JS->>DOM: Remove spinner classes after validation
JS->>DOM: Apply success or error classes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
corehq/apps/domain/static/domain/js/bootstrap5/billing_statements.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
corehq/apps/domain/static/domain/js/bootstrap5/billing_statements.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: - Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide and point out any mismatches - Also follow this guide
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: tests (python-sharded-and-javascript)
- GitHub Check: tests (python, bf)
- GitHub Check: tests (python, 6a)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: tests (python, 05)
| @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ | |||
| var bulkPaymentHandler = paymentMethodHandler( | |||
| "bulk-payment-form", | |||
| { | |||
| submitBtnText: gettext("Submit Payment"), | |||
| submitBtnText: "Submit Payment", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Restore gettext() wrapper for internationalization support.
The removal of the gettext() wrapper from the "Submit Payment" string will break internationalization support for this button text. This is inconsistent with other similar text in the file that still uses gettext() (see lines 52 and 62).
Apply this diff to restore internationalization support:
- submitBtnText: "Submit Payment",
+ submitBtnText: gettext("Submit Payment"),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| submitBtnText: "Submit Payment", | |
| submitBtnText: gettext("Submit Payment"), |
💡 Codebase verification
Internationalization pattern issues found in button texts.
- In the bootstrap5 billing statements file, we detect mixed usage: one occurrence of
submitBtnText: "Submit Payment",uses a direct, non-translated string while other instances in the same file (and in similar bootstrap3 files) wrap the text withgettext(). - This inconsistency in applying
gettext()may lead to partial internationalization support for button texts.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify internationalization patterns across the codebase.
Let's verify the consistency of gettext() usage for button text across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check gettext usage patterns for button text
# Look for similar button text patterns
echo "=== Button text patterns ==="
rg -g '*.js' -i 'submitBtnText.*Submit' -A 2
# Look for gettext usage patterns with "Submit"
echo -e "\n=== gettext usage with Submit ==="
rg -g '*.js' 'gettext\("Submit' -A 2
# Look for direct string assignments with "Submit"
echo -e "\n=== Direct string assignments with Submit ==="
rg -g '*.js' '"Submit[^"]*"' -A 2
Length of output: 9069
|
@CodeRabbit please review the latest commit. |
|
@Charl1996 I'll review the latest commit which adds the 🔗 Analysis chain🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 629 Script: Length of output: 799 ✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
corehq/apps/registration/static/registration/js/register_new_user.js (1)
45-46: LGTM! Consider combining class additions for better readability.The addition of the 'disable-on-submit' class is a good practice for providing visual feedback during validation.
Consider combining the class additions for better readability:
- .addClass('fa-spinner fa-spin') - .addClass('disable-on-submit'); + .addClass('fa-spinner fa-spin disable-on-submit');
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
corehq/apps/registration/static/registration/js/register_new_user.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
corehq/apps/registration/static/registration/js/register_new_user.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: - Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide and point out any mismatches - Also follow this guide
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
- GitHub Check: task-list-completed
- GitHub Check: task-list-completed
- GitHub Check: task-list-completed
- GitHub Check: tests (python-sharded-and-javascript)
- GitHub Check: tests (python, bf)
- GitHub Check: tests (python, 6a)
- GitHub Check: tests (python, 05)
|
@CodeRabbit Have you reviewed the following commit: eab431c |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @Charl1996 Yes, I have reviewed commit eab431c. This commit includes two changes:
Both changes look good and have been previously reviewed. 🔗 Analysis chain🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 2106 If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X? |
|
@CodeRabbit please review the latest changes. |
|
@Charl1996 I've reviewed the latest changes and noticed a potential issue. The removal of the error callback in
I recommend keeping the error handling to ensure a better user experience. Would you like me to suggest how to restore it? 🔗 Analysis chain@Charl1996 I'll review the latest changes. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 2496 ✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@CodeRabbit regarding your latest assessment, is there any other reason I should keep the error callback? |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @Charl1996 Yes, there is another important reason to keep the error callback: maintaining consistency with the codebase's error handling patterns. Looking at other Ajax calls in the codebase, error callbacks are consistently used to:
Following this established pattern helps maintain code consistency and makes the codebase more maintainable and predictable for other developers. 🔗 Analysis chain🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 69622 |
Don't merge.