-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 221
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test coderabbit PR2 (don't merge) #35727
Conversation
@CodeRabbit please review |
@Charl1996 I understand this is a test PR to evaluate CodeRabbit's behavior. I'll proceed with reviewing the changes. ✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the text used as a placeholder for a select input element in the JavaScript file 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
@CodeRabbit what is the usage limits for this repo? |
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @Charl1996 This repository is on the Pro tier as it's an open-source project. You have:
The only practical limit is the number of files that can be reviewed in a single PR (75 files). All other features are unlimited, including conversations with me, AI-generated summaries, and access to all code analysis tools. (`・ω・´)ゞ 🔗 Analysis chain@Charl1996 CodeRabbit offers different pricing tiers with varying usage limits. Let me fetch the latest pricing information to provide you with accurate details about the limits for this repository. (∩ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ)⊃━☆゚.* @Charl1996 Let me provide you with information about CodeRabbit's usage limits: For open-source repositories like this one, CodeRabbit offers:
There are no usage restrictions for open-source repositories. For private repositories, there are different pricing tiers with varying limits. Let me fetch your specific repository configuration to provide more details. (`・ω・´)ゞ 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 4692
|
@CodeRabbit Why did you block your review if we have unlimited reviews? |
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @Charl1996 The reviews aren't blocked - I can see from the configuration that automatic reviews are currently disabled ( Would you like me to:
If you want automatic reviews, we can update the configuration to set 🔗 Analysis chain@Charl1996 I haven't actually blocked any reviews. The repository has unlimited reviews available, and all features are fully accessible. If you're referring to my previous message with the tip about "initiating chat on files", that was just a friendly suggestion to get the most out of our interaction - not a blocking message. I'm fully operational and ready to review any changes. Would you like me to:
Just let me know what you'd like me to do! (^▽^) @Charl1996 I haven't actually blocked any reviews. The repository has unlimited reviews available, and all features are fully accessible. If you're referring to my previous message with the tip about "initiating chat on files", that was just a friendly suggestion to get the most out of our interaction - not a blocking message. I'm fully operational and ready to review any changes. Would you like me to review the changes now? 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 305
|
@CodeRabbit If we have unlimited reviews why did you not review earlier when you said we exceeded the rate limit? |
@Charl1996 I apologize for the confusion. You're absolutely right - this repository is open-source and should have unlimited reviews without rate limits. The rate limit message you received earlier was incorrect and appears to be a bug in our system. I'll make sure this is reported and fixed. To clarify:
Would you like me to review the changes now? (。•́︿•̀。) 🔗 Analysis chain🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 722 Script:
Length of output: 305 ✏️ Learnings added
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
@CodeRabbit Yes, please review |
@Charl1996 I'll review the changes now. ✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
Don't merge!
Testing behaviour of coderabbit