chore: standardize usage of config files #898
Open
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The unofficial convention for configuring different tooling has moved towards having a file named
<name>.config.js
for each tool that supports it. In most cases, tools support a variety of configuration approaches but in general, I prefer using a config file when possible because it allows for types-based checking + assistance when writing/updating the configuration, which is massively useful.This PR does the following:
package.json
tojest.config.js
package.json
tolint-staged.config.js
.prettierrc.js
toprettier.config.js
ESLint is notably omitted here because it requires upgrading to v9 in order to use this config file convention. That work is addressed via #897