chore(ci): use astral-sh/setup-uv action #734
Conversation
Generated by the task: njzjz-bot/njzjz-bot#9.
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request updates the workflow configurations for benchmarking and testing in the GitHub Actions setup for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GitHub Actions
participant UV Tool
User->>GitHub Actions: Trigger Workflow
GitHub Actions->>UV Tool: Setup using astral-sh/setup-uv@v3
UV Tool-->>GitHub Actions: Installation complete
GitHub Actions->>UV Tool: Run Tests or Benchmarks
UV Tool-->>GitHub Actions: Return Results
GitHub Actions-->>User: Complete Workflow
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #734 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #734 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 84.80% 84.80%
=======================================
Files 81 81
Lines 7336 7336
=======================================
Hits 6221 6221
Misses 1115 1115 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Need to figure out the RTD error. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/benchmark.yml (1)
16-21: Excellent upgrade to use the official uv setup action with caching!The change from using a curl command to the
astral-sh/setup-uv@v3action is a great improvement. It enhances security, maintainability, and introduces caching, which can significantly speed up workflow runs.Consider pinning the action to a specific version (e.g.,
astral-sh/[email protected]) to ensure consistent behavior across runs. This practice helps prevent unexpected issues that might arise from automatic updates to the action.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/benchmark.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/benchmark.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-28: Verify Read the Docs (RTD) build processWhile the changes to the GitHub Actions workflow look good, there's a concern mentioned in the PR comments about an error related to Read the Docs (RTD). Although these changes shouldn't directly affect the RTD build, it's important to ensure that the documentation build process remains functional.
To investigate the RTD error:
- Check the RTD build logs for any specific error messages.
- Verify if the RTD configuration uses a similar setup process for dependencies.
- Ensure that the RTD environment has access to all necessary dependencies.
Run the following script to check for any RTD configuration files and their content:
This script will help identify any RTD-specific configuration files and requirements, which could provide insights into the cause of the RTD error.
✅ Verification successful
Read the Docs (RTD) build remains unaffected
The RTD configuration files (
docs/rtd_environment.ymlanddocs/requirements.txt) are managed separately from the GitHub Actions workflow. The changes to the workflow, including setting up Python 3.12 and installing benchmark-specific dependencies, do not interfere with RTD's isolated build environment.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for RTD configuration files and their content # Test: Search for RTD configuration files echo "Searching for RTD configuration files:" fd -t f -e yml -e yaml | grep -i "readthedocs\|rtd" # Test: If found, display their content for file in $(fd -t f -e yml -e yaml | grep -i "readthedocs\|rtd"); do echo "Content of $file:" cat "$file" echo "---" done # Test: Check if there's a requirements file specifically for docs echo "Checking for documentation requirements:" fd requirements | grep -i "docs\|rtd" # Test: If found, display its content for file in $(fd requirements | grep -i "docs\|rtd"); do echo "Content of $file:" cat "$file" echo "---" doneLength of output: 904
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
23-23: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2102:info:1:26: Ranges can only match single chars (mentioned due to duplicates)
(shellcheck)
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Generated by the task: njzjz-bot/njzjz-bot#9.
Summary by CodeRabbit
uvtool.